Freezing of gait (FOG), detection, prediction and/or treatment

ABSTRACT

A method and system for provoking gait disorders, such as freezing of gait; usable, for example, for diagnosing and/or treatment thereof. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, displays of situations calculated to cause freezing of gait are presented to a subject, optionally using virtual reality displays. Optionally or alternatively, incipit freezing of gait is identified using changes in gait parameters, and optionally used to guide attempts at causing freezing of gait. Optionally or alternatively, a portable device is provided which detects incipit freezing of gait and generates a corrective signal to the subject.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/350,569 filed on Apr. 9, 2014, which is a National Phase of PCTPatent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055454 having International FilingDate of Oct. 9, 2012, which is related to co-filed PCT PatentApplication No. PCT/IB2012/055453, titled “VIRTUAL REALITY FOR MOVEMENTDISORDER DIAGNOSIS AND/OR TREATMENT”, the contents of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and also related tousing virtual reality displays for diagnosing and/or treating gaitdisorders, for example by provoking gait disorder appearance and/or fortraining. Such systems may be used in the context of the presentapplication, as well.

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.14/350,569 filed on Apr. 9, 2014, which is a National Phase of PCTPatent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055454 having International FilingDate of Oct. 9, 2012, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/545,161 and61/545,164 both filed on Oct. 9, 2011. The contents of the aboveapplications are all incorporated by reference as if fully set forthherein in their entirety.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, relates to methodsand/or apparatus for detecting and/or treating gait disorders, inparticular episodic gait disorders, more particularly, but notexclusively, freezing of gait disorders, whether associated withParkinson's disease or not.

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a paroxysmal gait disturbance, a sudden,transient and unpredictable interruption of walking. FOG typicallymanifests as a sudden and transient inability to move. The patientattempts to move forward, inexplicably however, he/she is unable to.Patients report that their feet are “glued to the ground”. FOG is adebilitating phenomenon that significantly reduces functionalindependence and often leads to wheelchair use.

The population which suffers mostly from FOG are subjects withParkinson's disease (PD). FOG is common in subjects with advancedParkinson's disease (PD), however one should bear in mind that FOG is asymptom complex that occurs in several disorders which also ofteninvolve cognitive impairment, e.g., progressive supranuclear palsy,multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, dementia with LewyBodies and higher level gait disorders. Manifestation of FOG is variablewithin and across subjects, yet a few subtypes have been described.These include, for example, freezing that occurs at the start of walking(i.e., gait initiation), during turns, when passing tight quarters andalso during simple walking in an open runway. FOG has a grave impact onquality of life as it is largely associated with falls, interferes withdaily living functions, and causes reduced activity and self-imposedsocial isolation.

The pathophysiology behind the symptom is not clear. A number oftheories have been proposed mainly in reference to patients with PD.Briefly, the breakup of regular gait that results in a subject who isvirtually ‘frozen’ in one place lacking the ability to produce effectiveprogression, is hypothesized to stem from deterioration of certain gaitfeatures, (or inability to start the operation of these gait features incase FOG occurs at the start of walking) to an extent that gait cannotbe regulated. Gait features that were implicated with FOG are gaitrhythmicity, left-right stepping coordination, step length scaling, gaitsymmetry and dynamic control of postural stability. Each of these gaitfeatures is compromised even during the functional periods of locomotionpreformed by PD patients that suffer from FOG (PD+FOG), and theirbackground impaired condition is related to the pathological conditionof the brain in PD. For example, bilateral coordination of gait isimpaired in PD, possibly due to the un-even neuronal loss seen on bothsides of the brain in this neurodegenerative disease. Major dopaninergicdepletion in the Basal Ganglia, a brain region that normally facilitatesmovement scaling, is most likely behind the step scaling problem in thisdisease. It was also hypothesized that additional pathologicalconditions overlap with these gait impairments to distinguish those PDpatients who will suffer from freezing from those who will not. Forexample, reduced cognitive capacities, in particular in the executivefunction domains, were associated with and believed to contribute tofreezing in PD.

Methods for diagnosing and treating FOG are quite limited. Oftenpatients who report many freezing incidents during their daily routinefail to exhibit even one under examination at the neurologist's office,most likely due to psychological effects. Therefore the effectiveness ofproposed treatments is evaluated only in a limited manner. Even amongpatients who do present with FOG in the clinic, it is difficult toquantify the magnitude of the problem. This limits the ability toevaluate the effectiveness of any treatments attempts.

Subjective assessment is currently used to determine the severity offreezing. Several questionnaires are in common use in clinical practicethat assess if freezing occurs, how often and under which circumstances.These quaternaries sometimes obscure the correct clinical pictures sincesometimes patients change their reports between consecutive visits thatare separated by only a short period of time. Actually, this problem ledto the creation of a questionnaire in which spouses and caregivers bothprovide information. Recently, mobility sensors were suggestedalternative for the assessment of the FOG burden. Current treatments arebased on pharmacological treatments. Recently some have suggested usingsurgical implantation of stimulating electrodes to specific parts of thebrain, however, this is not widely accepted, is quite invasive, and theevidence for its efficacy is not yet strong.

FOG is generally not well addressed by current treatment approaches.Immediate, small, short-term improvements in FOG have been demonstratedin a handful of studies. Many of these focus on the use of visual orauditory cues to facilitate movement and reduce FOG. There is evidencethat PD+FOG may respond differently to cues than PD-FOG and thatappropriate cues can, while present, result in improved velocity andstride length and reduced FOG. A large randomized trial examining theeffects of cueing on FOG demonstrated slight improvements in FOG (5.5%reduction) but little retention of benefit six weeks after training. Theeffects of a comprehensive physical therapy program that included cueingon FOG, demonstrating improvements in FOG immediately following a 6-weekintervention but a return to baseline levels of FOG one month later.Preliminary work on turning, e.g., when the subject turns left, right orin a circle, suggests that rotating treadmill training may have adramatic effect on FOG when the subjects walk in normal daily conditionsafter the intervention.

To date, methods for diagnosing and treating FOG are quite limited.Often patients who report many freezing episodes during their dailyroutine fail to exhibit them under testing or examination conditionssuch as at the neurologist office. Therefore the effectiveness ofprescribed treatments is evaluated only in a limited manner. Even amongpatients who do present with FOG in the clinic, it is difficult toquantify the magnitude of the problem as it is episodic. In addition,due, in part, to the variable nature of the appearance of the symptom,standardized treatment approaches are not effective.

REFERENCE LIST RELATED (ALSO) TO MECHANISMS OF FREEZING OF GAIT

-   1. Nutt J G, Bloem B R, Giladi N, Hallett M, Horak F B, Nieuwboer A.    Freezing of gait: moving forward on a mysterious clinical    phenomenon. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10(8):734-44.-   2. Plotnik M, Hausdorff J M. The role of gait rhythmicity and    bilateral coordination of stepping in the pathophysiology of    freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2008; 23 Suppl    2:S444-S450.-   3. Hausdorff J M, Schaafsma J D, Balash Y, Bartels A L, Gurevich T,    Giladi N. Impaired regulation of stride variability in Parkinson's    disease subjects with freezing of gait. Exp. Brain Res. 2003;    149(2):187-94.-   4. Plotnik M, Giladi N, Hausdorff J M. Bilateral Coordination of    Walking and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. Eur. J.    Neurosci. 2008; 27(8):1999-2006.-   5. Plotnik M, Giladi N, Balash Y, Peretz C, Hausdorff J M. Is    freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease related to asymmetric motor    function? Ann. Neurol. 2005; 57(5):656-63.-   6. Jacobs J V, Nutt J G, Carlson-Kuhta P, Stephens M, Horak F B.    Knee trembling during freezing of gait represents multiple    anticipatory postural adjustments. Exp. Neurol. 2009; 215(2):334-41.-   7. Chee R, Murphy A, Danoudis M, Georgiou-Karistianis N, lansek R.    Gait freezing in Parkinson's disease and the stride length sequence    effect interaction. Brain 2009; 132(Pt 8):2151-60.-   8. lansek R, Huxham F, McGinley J. The sequence effect and gait    festination in Parkinson disease: Contributors to freezing of gait?    Mov Disord. 2006; 21(9):1419-24.-   9. Nieuwboer A, Dom R, De Weerdt W, Desloovere K, Fieuws S,    Broens-Kaucsik E. Abnormalities of the spatiotemporal    characteristics of gait at the onset of freezing in Parkinson's    disease. Mov Disord. 2001; 16(6):1066-75.-   10. Nieuwboer A, Dom R, De Weerdt W, Desloovere K, Janssens L,    Stijn V. Electromyographic profiles of gait prior to onset of    freezing episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain 2004;    127(Pt 7):1650-60.-   11. Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Desloovere K, Vandenberghe W,    Kerckhofs E, Nieuwboer A. Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease:    the impact of dual-tasking and turning. Mov Disord. 2010;    25(15):2563-70.-   12. Fahn S. The freezing phenomenon in Parkinsonism. Negative motor    phenomenon. 1995; 67:53-63.

REFERENCE LIST RELATED (ALSO) TO TREATMENT OF FREEZING OF GAIT

-   1. Fasano A, Herzog J, Seifert E, Stolze H, Falk D, Reese R et al.    Modulation of gait coordination by subthalamic stimulation improves    freezing of gait. Mov Disord. 2011; 26(5):844-51.-   2. Mehrholz J, Friis R, Kugler J, Twork S, Storch A, Pohl M.    Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease Cochrane    Database Syst Rev. 2010: 20; (1):CD007830.-   3. Hong M, Earhart G M. Rotating treadmill training reduces freezing    in Parkinson disease: preliminary observations. Parkinsonism. Relat    Disord. 2008; 14(4):359-63.-   4. Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, Deutekom M, Nieuwboer A, Willems    A et al. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients    with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Clin. Rehabil. 2005;    19(7):695-713.-   5. Bachlin M, Plotnik M, Roggen D, Giladi N, Hausdorff J M,    Troster G. A wearable system to assist walking of Parkinson s    disease patients. Methods Inf. Med. 2010; 49(1):88-95.-   6. Giladi N, Nieuwboer, A. Understanding and treating freezing of    gait in Parkinsonism, proposed working definition, and setting the    stage. Movement Disorders. 2008; 23(Suppl. 2):S423-S5.-   7. Snijders A H, Bloem B R. Images in clinical medicine. Cycling for    freezing of gait. N Engl J Med. 2010 April; 362(13):e46.-   8. Brichetto G, Pelosin, E., Marchese, R., Abbruzzese, G. Evaluation    of physical therapy in parkinsonian patients with freezing of gait:    a pilot study. Clinical Rehab. 2006; 20:31-5.-   9. Frazzitta G, Maestri R, Uccellini D, Bertotti G, Abelli P.    Rehabilitation treatment of gait in patients with Parkinson's    disease with freezing: a comparison between two physical therapy    protocols using visual and auditory cues with or without treadmill    training. Mov Disord. 2009 June; 24(8):1139-43.-   10. Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, Deutekom M, Nieuwboer A, Willems    A et al. “Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients    with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review”. Clin. Rehabil. 2005;    19(7):695-713.-   11. J M Hausdorff, J Lowenthal, T Herman, L Gruendlinger, C Peretz,    N Giladi. “Rhythmic auditory stimulation modulates gait variability    in Parkinson's disease”. Eur J Neurosci. 2007: 26:2369-2375.-   12. S. Frenkel-Toledo, N. Giladi, C. Peretz T. Herman, L.    Gruendlinger, J. M. Hausdorff. “Treadmill walking as a pacemaker to    improve gait rhythm and stability in Parkinson's disease”. Mov    Disord 2005; 20:1109-1114.-   13. T. Rubenstein, N. Giladi, J. M. Hausdorff. “The power of cueing    circumvent dopamine deficits: A brief review of physical therapy    treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease”. Mov Disord,    Vol. 17, pp. 1148-1160, 2002.-   14. “Targeting dopa-sensitive and dopa-resistant gait dysfunction in    Parkinson's disease: selective responses to internal and external    cues”. Rochester L, Baker K, Nieuwboer A, Burn D. Mov Disord. 2011    Feb. 15; 26(3):430-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.23450. Epub 2010 Dec. 13.

REFERENCE LIST RELATED (ALSO) TO ASSESSMENT OF FREEZING OF GAIT

-   1. Schaafsma J D, Balash Y, Gurevich T, Bartels A L, Hausdorff J M,    Giladi N. Characterization of freezing of gait subtypes and the    response of each to levodopa in Parkinson's disease. Eur. J Neurol    2003; 10(4):391-8.-   2. Snijders A H, Nijkrake M J, Bakker M, Munneke M, Wind C, Bloem    B R. Clinimetrics of freezing of gait. Mov Disord. 2008; 23 Suppl    2:S468-S474.-   3. Moore S T, Macdougall H G, Ondo W G. Ambulatory monitoring of    freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008;    167(2):340-8.-   4. Giladi N, Kao, R., and Fahn, S. Freezing phenomenon in patients    with Parkinsonian Syndromes. MovDisord. 1997; 12:302-5.-   5. Ziegler K, Schroeteler F, Ceballos-Baumann A O, Fietzek U M. A    new rating instrument to assess festination and freezing gait in    Parkinsonian patients. Mov Disord. 2010 June; 25(8):1012-8.-   6. Bachlin M, Plotnik M, Roggen D, Maidan I, Hausdorff J M, Giladi N    et al. Wearable assistant for Parkinson's disease patients with the    freezing of gait symptom. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2010;    14(2):436-46.-   7. Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon E S, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn A D.    Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with    Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2000 Jul. 1; 6(3):165-170.-   8. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Herman T, Vandenberghe W, Emil G E,    Thomaes T, Giladi N. Reliability of the new freezing of gait    questionnaire: agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease    and their carers. Gait Posture. 2009 November; 30(4):459-63. Epub    2009 Aug. 5.-   9. Moore S T, Macdougall H G, Ondo W G. “Ambulatory monitoring of    freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease”. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008;    167(2):340-8.-   10. J. M. Hausdorff, J. Balash, N. Giladi “Time series analysis of    leg movements during freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease:    akinesia, rhyme or reason?” Physica A: Stat Mechanics & Appl 2003;    321: 565-570.-   11. Exp Neurol. 2009 February; 215(2):334-41. Knee trembling during    freezing of gait represents multiple anticipatory postural    adjustments. Jacobs J V, Nutt J G, Carlson-Kuhta P, Stephens M,    Horak F B.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to diagnosis and/or treatment ofepisodic gait disorders, for example freezing of gait (FOG), forexample, by provoking freezing of gait and/or measuring changes in gaitdue to such provoking. Optionally or alternatively, measurements of gaitare used to identify an increased risk for imminent FOG and preventiveaction is optionally taken.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, a method of assessing FOG (Freezing of Gait), comprising:

providing a stimulus designed to increase a likelihood of FOG in somesubjects, to a subject; and

monitoring the effect of the stimulus on the subject.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesidentifying near-FOG situations based on said monitoring. Optionally oralternatively, the method comprises identifying FOG situations based onsaid monitoring. Optionally or alternatively, the method comprisesrepeating said providing in response to said monitoring. Optionally,said repeating is adjusted to provide a desired rate or amount of FOG ornear-FOG situations.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisestesting an efficacy of a treatment by repeating said providing and saidmonitoring after said treatment is provided to the subject. Optionally,the method comprises selecting a treatment based on relative efficacy ofdifferent treatments tried.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, comprises provoking usingvirtual reality. Optionally, said display includes one or morenarrowings of a pathway.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, providing comprisesencouraging one or more of turning, rhythmic movement and gait lengthchange.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, monitoring comprisesmeasuring one or more gait characteristic.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method is applied as astandard test for FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesselecting a treatment based on said monitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesgenerating a FOG burden for said subject based on said monitoring.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, a method to train for FOG, comprising:

providing a plurality of stimuli selected to increase a likelihood ofFOG in a particular subject, to that subject. Optionally, the methodcomprises selecting said situations by a standardized testing using a VRsystem. Optionally or alternatively, said providing is at a patient'slocation of daily activities and during such activities.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, a method of treating FOG, comprising:

automatically identifying an increased likelihood of an upcoming FOGevent in a patient; and

providing a cue to said patient in a manner which prevents and/or assistin overcoming said FOG event.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, a system for FOG assessment and/or training, comprising:

(a) a VR display system;

(b) a controller programmed to provide on said VR display system one ormore scenes designed to encourage FOG. Optionally, the system comprisesone or more physiological and/or movement sensors which provide feedbackto said controller and which said controller uses to vary a display inconnection with modifying a FOG likelihood.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, a system for assisting with FOG, comprising:

(a) a movement sensor;

(b) an output;

(c) a controller configured to process a signal from said sensor todetect an increase in likelihood of FOG and generate a signal on saidoutput in response thereto. Optionally, said system is designed to beworn and wherein said output signal is suitable to prevent and/or assistin overcoming FOG. Optionally or alternatively, said controller isprogrammed to providing a training in FOG avoidance to a subject.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method of measuring FOG (Freezing of Gait), comprising:

providing a stimulus designed to increase a likelihood of FOG in somesubjects, to a subject; and

monitoring the effect of the stimulus on the subject. Optionally, themethod comprises identifying near-FOG situations based on saidmonitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesidentifying FOG situations based on said monitoring. Optionally, themethod comprises calculating a FOG Index (FI) based on a ratio betweenthe power in gait frequencies and power in FOG frequencies.

Optionally or alternatively, the method comprises calculating a FOGIndex (FI) based on a k-means method.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesadapting said identifying to said subject.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesidentifying FOG based on a combination of two or more of acceleration,gyroscope, other movement sensors, EMG, APAs, heart rate and/or cerebralsignals.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprises cuingsaid subject with FOG averting stimuli during said monitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said monitoring comprisesmonitoring on a locomotion system.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesrepeating said providing in response to said monitoring. Optionally,said repeating is modified in response to said monitoring in a closedcontrol loop. Optionally, said repeating is adjusted to provide adesired rate or amount of FOG or near-FOG situations.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisestesting an efficacy of a treatment by repeating said providing and saidmonitoring after said treatment is provided to the subject. Optionally,the method comprises selecting a treatment based on relative efficacy ofdifferent treatments tried.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, providing comprisesprovoking using virtual reality. Optionally, said display includes oneor more narrowings of a pathway.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, providing comprisesencouraging one or more of turning, rhythmic movement and gait lengthchange.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, monitoring comprisesmeasuring one or more gait characteristic.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method is applied as astandard test for FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesselecting a treatment based on said monitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesgenerating a FOG burden for said subject based on said monitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, monitoring comprisesdetecting a sub-clinical FOG state.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, monitoring comprisesmonitoring a change in blood flow in the brain.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesquantifying a future risk of FOG based on said monitoring.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisesquantifying a number and degree of FOG events during said monitoring.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method to train for FOG, comprising:

providing a plurality of stimuli selected to increase a likelihood ofFOG in a particular subject subjects, to that subject. In an exemplaryembodiment of the invention, the method comprises selecting saidsituations by a standardized testing using a VR system. Optionally oralternatively, said providing is at a patient's location of dailyactivities and during such activities.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method of treating FOG, comprising:

automatically identifying an increased likelihood of an upcoming FOGevent in a patient; and

providing a cue to said patient in a manner which may prevent and/orassist in overcoming said FOG event.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a system for FOG assessment and/or training, comprising:

(a) a VR display system;

(b) a controller programmed to provide on said VR display system one ormore scenes designed to encourage FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the system comprises one ormore physiological and/or movement sensors which provide feedback tosaid controller and which said controller uses to vary a display inconnection with modifying a FOG likelihood. Optionally or alternatively,said controller provides an obstacle for a subject to respond to.Optionally or alternatively, said controller provides a cognitive loadfor a subject to respond to. Optionally or alternatively, saidcontroller provides an environmental feature for a subject to respondto. Optionally or alternatively, said controller provides a perceptualload for a subject to respond to.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a system for assisting with FOG, comprising:

(a) a sensor;

(b) an output;

(c) a controller configured to process a signal from said sensor todetect an increase in likelihood of FOG and generate a signal on saidoutput in response thereto. Optionally, said system is designed to beworn and wherein said output signal is suitable to prevent and/or assistin overcoming FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said controller isprogrammed to providing a training in FOG avoidance to a subject.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said sensor generates anindication of blood flow change in the brain.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said sensor generates anindication of acceleration of a body part.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said controller determinesthe existence of a sub-clinical FOG state.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method of measuring gait characteristics of a subject,comprising:

collecting signals from at least one sensor making a physiologicalmeasurement of the subject; and

processing said signal to detect a sub-clinical state of FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the method comprisescalculating a future risk of FOG in said subject based, at least inpart, on said detected state.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said detected state is notvisually detectable by observation of said subject.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method of measuring gait characteristics a subject,comprising:

detecting a change in blood flow to a brain region in a subject at leastplanning locomotion; and

determining a FOG or sub-clinical FOG state based, at least in part, onsaid detected change.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, said change comprises areduction in blood flow to frontal lobes of said subject. Optionally oralternatively, said determining comprises also using acceleration dataof at least one limb of said subject. Optionally or alternatively, saiddetecting comprises using an fNIRS sensor. Optionally or alternatively,said detecting comprises using an EEG sensor.

There is provided in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention a method of quantifying FOG, comprising calculating a FOGIndex (FI) based on a physiological measure that is combined with atleast one background measure of FOG propensity. Optionally, saidbackground measure comprises a reaction to an obstacle. Optionally oralternatively, said background measure comprises a cost of a cognitiveload. Optionally or alternatively, said background measure comprises acost of an environmental feature. Optionally or alternatively, saidbackground measure comprises a cost of a perceptual load. Optionally oralternatively, said physiological measure includes an APA (anticipatorypostural adjustment).

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and/or scientific terms usedherein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinaryskill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although methods andmaterials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used inthe practice or testing of embodiments of the invention, exemplarymethods and/or materials are described below. In case of conflict, thepatent specification, including definitions, will control. In addition,the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are notintended to be necessarily limiting.

Implementation of the method and/or system of embodiments of theinvention can involve performing or completing selected tasks manually,automatically, or a combination thereof. Moreover, according to actualinstrumentation and equipment of embodiments of the method and/or systemof the invention, several selected tasks could be implemented byhardware, by software or by firmware or by a combination thereof usingan operating system.

For example, hardware for performing selected tasks according toembodiments of the invention could be implemented as a chip or acircuit. As software, selected tasks according to embodiments of theinvention could be implemented as a plurality of software instructionsbeing executed by a computer using any suitable operating system. In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, one or more tasks according toexemplary embodiments of method and/or system as described herein areperformed by a data processor, such as a computing platform forexecuting a plurality of instructions. Optionally, the data processorincludes a volatile memory for storing instructions and/or data and/or anon-volatile storage, for example, a magnetic hard-disk and/or removablemedia, for storing instructions and/or data. Optionally, a networkconnection is provided as well. A display and/or a user input devicesuch as a keyboard or mouse are optionally provided as well.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Some embodiments of the invention are herein described, by way ofexample only, with reference to the accompanying drawings and graphics.With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressedthat the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes ofillustrative discussion of embodiments of the invention. In this regard,the description taken with the drawings makes apparent to those skilledin the art how embodiments of the invention may be practiced.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a set of graphs schematically showing freezing of gait andgait features deterioration, as used in accordance with some embodimentsof the invention;

FIG. 2A is a schematic drawing of a FOG detection and/or treatmentsystem in accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 2B is a schematic drawing of a FOG detection and/or treatment unitin accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 2C is a flowchart of a method of diagnosing a FOG status of apatient in accordance with some exemplary embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 2D is a flowchart of a method of treating a FOG disorder and/orevent of a patient in accordance with some exemplary embodiments of theinvention;

FIG. 3 is a set of charts illustrating intervening to improve overallgait performance and to reduce the FOG burden, in accordance with someembodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4A is an image showing an implementation set up in accordance withsome embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4B illustrates a shimmer sensor used in accordance with someembodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4C is an aerial visual representation of the VR simulation trailand a recorded FOG event within the trail, in accordance with someembodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4D shows two examples of virtual scenes designed to provoke FOG, inaccordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 5 is two examples of virtual freeze provoking scenarios, inaccordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 6 shows the acceleration signal of the gait of patient 2 during theobstacle condition (trial 1), in an example according to an exemplaryembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 7 shows the raw acceleration signal and spectral density of thefrequency band of gait of a patient (patient 4) over 10 seconds duringthe no-obstacle trial, in an example in accordance with an exemplaryembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 shows a comparison between the acceleration signal of a regulargait and the signal during a FOG episode, in accordance with anexemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 9 shows the raw signal from the fNIRS (functional near-infraredspectroscopy), in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 10 shows the raw signal from the fNIRS during a trial (1) withobstacles with no FOG detected, in accordance with an exemplaryembodiment of the invention;

FIG. 11 shows signals from three physiological sensors, in accordancewith an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 12 shows an effect of intervention on FOG burden during figure 8shaped paths, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 13 shows the effect of intervention on FOG burden during straightline corridor walking, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 14 is a table 1 showing FOG quantification and scoring, inaccordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 15A-15D are graphs showing results of a k-means FOG detectionmethod, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 15E is a table 2 showing patient characteristics as used for anexample in accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 16 is a table 3 showing measures of consistency of patients as usedfor an example in accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 17 is a table 4 showing test parameters of patient 1, as used foran example in accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 18 is a table 5 showing test parameters of patient 2, as used foran example in accordance with some embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 19 is a table 6 showing test parameters of patient 3, as used foran example in accordance with some embodiments of the invention; and

FIG. 20 is a table 7 showing test parameters of patient 4, as used foran example in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, is related todiagnosis and/or treatment of episodic gait disorders, for examplefreezing of gait (FOG), for example, by provoking freezing of gaitand/or measuring changes in gait and/or cranial blood flow due to suchprovoking. Optionally or alternatively, measurements of gait are used toidentify an increased risk for imminent FOG and preventive action isoptionally taken.

Overview

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system is provided whichuses a novel modality that will expose patients to FOG-invokingsituations, in a well-controlled and safe environment, quantify theseverity and specific pattern of FOG for each person, and thenoptionally provide treatment according to these needs. Optionally,treatment will be based on allowing the patient to adapt, using implicitmotor learning, and, eventually, more appropriately deal with thecircumstances that would otherwise lead to FOG. While focusing on FOG,systems and methods as described herein may also be used for other gaitdisorders.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, what is provided is a FOGstress test based on physiological measures and to quantify these FOGepisodes to assess its characteristics. In an exemplary embodiment ofthe invention, the stress test can be used to selectively stress variouscomponents of the patient's totality, to determine which and how much,each contributes to FOG. For example, a cognitive ability may be stressand/or a perceptual ability may be stressed. In an exemplary embodimentof the invention, the stress test can provoke a higher frequency of FOG(and/or pre-FOG) events (e.g., per step) than normally detected, forexample, by a factor of 2, 10, 50, 100, 200, 100 or intermediate orlarger factors.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the system can provide oneor both of identification of an on-going FOG event and/or predicting theoccurrence of a visible manifestation of FOG. Optionally, these areprovided even on a locomotion device, such as a treadmill, whichprovides cuing.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to systems and/ormethods that integrate online locomotion stimulating and monitoringtechnologies, for, inter alia, diagnosing and/or treating FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such a system canautomatically identify walking patterns of an individual; introducecontrolled freezing provoking situations (e.g., as a ‘freezing stresstest’); and/or evaluate the response of the subject to the freezingstress test, optionally by providing a score and/or identifying thedominancy of subtypes of freezing. In particular, one or more of thefollowing subtypes may be identified: ‘start hesitation’, ‘turninghesitation’, ‘narrow passage freezing’, ‘open runway freezing’ and‘reaching destination freezing’. In an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, an orthogonal definition of sub-types relates to scope:short, long and sub-freezes, where sub freezes can be specific, forexample, to any of the above situations, but not be visual and/or notfunctionally affect patient. In this context, a freezing episode thatlasts less than 0.5 seconds, for example, may have only a minimal impactand may not be felt by the subject, maybe considered a sub-freeze. Anepisode of up to, for example, 3 seconds may be a short freeze andlonger episodes may be long freezes. Other time thresholds may be usedas well. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it is presumedthat sub-freezes are pre-cursors of longer and more disabling freezingevents.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a repertoire of one or moretreatments based on strategy learning suitable for the individual,related to the specific evaluation, are provided. For example, if thestress test reveals that the patient is prone to freezing specificallywhen he/she approaches a narrow passage, the virtual reality trainingprogram may include many scenarios and scenes in which the width of thepath is manipulated. As another example, if the assessment reveals thatthe patient is especially prone to freezing when he or she is requiredto attend to another task while walking, then the training may includesessions designed to implicitly teach the patient to walk while dualtasking. For example, if the stress test reveals that the patient isprone to freezing when he/she is required to dual task and navigatearound obstacles, these elements may be featured in the trainingprogram. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, for example, via agradual and tuned exposure to these freezing provoking elements, in asafe environment, the training may act like a vaccine, empowering thepatient to, for example implicitly, learn to appropriately deal withthese situations, sometimes by way of cognitive and/or motorcompensation, for example, based on the application of motor learningprinciples.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such a stress test is basedon both of presentation of situations and measuring the effect of suchstress on one or more physiological, motor, behavioral and/or cognitivemeasures. Exemplary types of stress that may encourage provocation offreezing include, for example: a) Stimulating challenge on bilateralcoordination of gait by using split belt treadmill with 2 belts runningin unequal velocities or requiring the left and right legs to act out ofphase by providing obstacles b) increasing the frequency of stop andstart of walking to provoke start hesitation freezing, c) imposingwalking in reduced step length, to provoke freezing occurring whenstride length is reduced, d) increase cognitive load and/or divertattention, e.g., by performing a simultaneous cognitive task whilewalking; the load optionally being increased when a pre-FOG or FOGsituation is detected; this can be achieved, for example, by addingdistracters into the VR scene, and/or increasing their intensity, levelof detail, distraction ability and/or frequency, and/or by asking thepatient to perform increasingly difficult tasks while walking in the VRscene, e.g., first count forward, then count backwards by is, thenserial 3 subtractions, then serial 7 subtractions, e) introducingchallenging walking tasks such as obstacle negotiation in limited timeto create mental stress and/or f) forcing gait in changing paceconditions to impose gait dysrhythmicty that is associated withfreezing. Levels of provocation can range, for example, from noprovocation of one or more types to combining provocations fromdifferent types, thus potentially creating continuum scale of challenge.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the frequency ofprovocation and/or overlap in time of provocations can be varied aswell. The number of FOG episodes (level of success) and their durationmay then serve as a measurable score for the level of freezing severity.For example, these parameters may be weighted based on the level and/ordegree of provocation. For example, if someone experiences many freezingepisodes even when there are no provocations, no cognitive loading andno distracters, these episodes will receive a relatively high weight. Incontrast, if someone only has a few freezing episodes when he/she isexposed to the most challenging conditions of the stress test, theweight of these episodes in the scoring may be relatively small.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to measuring FOGsusceptibility by providing controlled provocations. In an exemplaryembodiment of the invention, accurate and/or quantitative diagnosis ofFOG is provided. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention,adaptations and/or developments in mobility patterns with respect toFOG, are determined, based on physiological measures. Optionally oralternatively, the occurrence and/or frequency of occurrence and/ortriggers for occurrence of FOG episodes among people who suffer from thesymptom are at least estimated.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a “FOG load” is defined persubject, which relates to how much a given situation (e.g., includingtriggers) increases a likelihood of a FOG episode and/or otherwiseadversely affect gait.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to controllablyplacing of a subject in circumstances that provoke FOG, where the degreeof provocation is measurable and adjustable. Optionally, this providesthe ability to sensitively and/or accurately monitor changes in FOG overtime and/or in response to treatments. Provocations can include forexample one or more of the examples listed above and/or: a) Stimulatingchallenge on bilateral coordination of gait by using split belttreadmill with 2 belts running in unequal velocities b) increasing thefrequency of stop and start of walking to provoke start hesitationfreezing, c) imposing walking in reduced step length, to provokefreezing occurring when stride length is reduced, d) performingsimultaneous cognitive task while walking to divert attention, e)introducing challenging walking task such as obstacle negotiation inlimited time to create mental stress, and/or f) forcing gait in changingpace conditions to impose gait dysrhythmicty that is associated withfreezing. Levels of provocation can range from no provocation of one ormore types to combined provocations from different types, thus creatingcontinuum scale of challenge. The number of FOG episodes and theirduration, optionally in combination with the level and degree ofprovocation, may serve as a measurable score for the level of freezingseverity.

It is a particular feature of some embodiments of the invention, thatFOG situation are deliberately triggered so as to provide sufficientexamples in a laboratory (or other) situation, for testing and/ortreatment. Optionally, one or more near-FOG situations are caused, suchsituations optionally being identified by their effect on gait and/orcognitive behavior, e.g., one or more of bilateral coordinationdeteriorates, and/or gait rhythmicity, and/or gait asymmetry, and/orgait asymmetry, and/or performance in dual tasking conditions.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to a systemand/or method for reducing propensity toward FOG via appropriate motorlearning and/or exposure to FOG-invoking situations. Optionally, suchsituations are provided in a well-controlled environment that allows thepatient to adapt, over time, and eventually to more appropriately dealwith the circumstances that would otherwise lead to FOG. For example apatient who is particularly prone to ‘start hesitation’ type offreezing, will be exposed to many ‘start walking’ conditions, the systemthat monitors his/her behavior will identify if the provocation isindeed leading to FOG, and if yes, an external cuing will be used toteach the subject to avoid the episode. It is believed that intensiverepetitions of such trainings will cause the nervous system to identifythese near FOG situations and to generate the motor response that wasgenerated during the training periods in a proactive manner, before FOGoccurs. The results shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 support this possibility.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a training program includescontinuous measurement of patient status and thus allows, for example,adjusting a training program to address a patient's abilities and/orprogress.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, training is provided duringdaily living conditions and/or at home. For example, a patient may beprovoked into FOG, for example, after some warning, while carrying outan activity such as walking and turning, one of the more commonprovocations, in his house.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to a systemand/or method for providing warning on an incipient FOG and/or ongoingevent. Optionally, such a system is worn by a patient and/or is locatedin a place of activity, such as a home.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such a system, in additionto or alternatively to providing warnings, provides signals or cues tohelp prevent and/or break out of a FOG situation. This could be in theform of vibratory or auditory cues or electrical stimulation to a limbor other part of the body.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such a system, in additionto or alternatively to warnings and/or cuing, is used to provide atraining program to maintain and reinforce training benefits duringdaily living conditions, outside of any laboratory based trainingsessions.

In some exemplary embodiments of the invention, a treatment system isprovided. Using the information provided, for example, by the system,after a baseline assessment, the system can automatically (e.g., ormanually by an operator or therapist) create individually-tailoredtraining programs to train the motor system of the subject, for example,to adapt motor strategies that distance a subject from the physiologicalcircumstances that lead to FOG (e.g., see FIG. 3). For example, if theevaluation highlights that a subject has mainly problems with gaitasymmetry, the focus of the treatment will be on motor learning thatwill result in modifying the gait pattern to become more coordinated,optionally in part, via repeated and measured asymmetrical challenges(e.g., more obstacles on the left side than the ride side) In anotherexample, If it is determined that adding a cognitive load is needed thenit will use the VR simulation to provide training that is rich withcognitive stimulus tasks such as visual spatial processing, attention,planning and executive function. Gradual exposure to these challengesenables accommodation and allows the patient to learn how to grapplewith these situation; over time, the challenges will become moredifficult, and the learning can continue, for example, until it achievedthe desired result, even in the more challenging conditions. The gradualprocess may allow the patient to slowly expand his/her capabilities,encourages engagement of the subject in the process, and minimizesdiscouragement and frustration; the end result is possibly a greateropportunity for motor learning. In alternative embodiments, anon-gradual approach is used.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to detection ofsub-clinical FOG states and events, for example, events which are notamenable to identification by eye and/or events which the subject is nothimself aware of.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such sub-clinical statesare identified, at least in part, based on a change in cerebralprocessing, for example, as evidenced by changes in blood flow to thebrain, for example, as evidenced by flow of blood from frontal lobes(e.g., over a time of 0.3, 1, 3, 5, 10 seconds or intermediate or otherlengths of time) and/or flow of blood to motor and/or pre-motor regions(e.g., for same times). Optionally or alternatively, sub-clinical statesare detected based on motion analysis, for example subtle trembling(e.g., detected as increase in power in high frequencies) of a limb,even if there is no change in actual gait periodicity and/or length.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a single walking event, forexample, between 1 and 30 seconds long, or for example, between 3 and 10seconds long is identifiable (e.g., based on system settings) as FOG,pre-FOG and/or sub-clinical FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, risk for upcoming FOGevents, e.g., in next hour, day, week, month, year and/or integermultiples thereof and/or intermediate periods is assessed based on theanalysis. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, such analysis andprediction may be provided even if no visible FOG events are detected,only sub-0-clinical events.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to detection ofFOG, near-FOG and/or sub-clinical FOG events and/or classifying (e.g.,automatically and/or manually) said detected gait abnormalities, basedon changes in cerebral processing, for example, based on changes orindication of changes in flow. For example, reduced flow to the temporallobes and/or increased flow to motor or pre-motor areas may indicate FOGof certain types. Increased flow to temporal lobes may indicate acognitive difficulty in gait, for example, due to an obstacle. Increasedflow to the frontal lobes may reflect an attempt at utilizing cognitivefunction and attention to compensate for impaired “motor” mechanisms.

Potential benefits of some embodiments of the invention include one ormore of enabling accurate diagnosis of FOG propensity, while quantifyingthe severity of FOG and identifying the circumstances that most likelylead to FOG in the specific patient; providing treatment that will bepersonalized and tailored for the patient's needs; and time. Forexample, within 20 minutes (5 trials of 4 minute walks each), one canassess and diagnose FOG and quantify the gait and FOG features andtherefore can assist with providing the most appropriate personalizedcare that will address the patients needs.

An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to a FOGpropensity score based not only on number and/or duration of FOG events.In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the score is based onsub-clinical events. Optionally or alternatively, the score is based ona reaction to environmental load. Optionally or alternatively, the scoreis based on a reaction to a cognitive load, for example, dual taskand/or attention tasks. Optionally or alternatively, the score is basedon a perceptual load (e.g., lighting conditions). Optionally oralternatively, the score is based on the response to an obstacle and/orspecific obstacle properties. Optionally or alternatively, the score isbased on one or more background gait qualities.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the score depends ondetection of APAs which may indicate a patient's preparation for achallenge and/or gait disorder.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the score is a linear sumof considerations, each weighted, for example, according to patientcharacteristics, for example, based on a library of control subjects.Other forms of score formula may be used as well.

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, itis to be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited in itsapplication to the details of construction and the arrangement of thecomponents and/or methods set forth in the following description and/orillustrated in the drawings and/or the Examples. The invention iscapable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out invarious ways.

Some Example Classifications

Some embodiments of the invention are based on the realization that thepathophysiology of FOG may be distinct from that which leads to otherparkinsonian symptoms. For example, no correlation was found between thefrequency of FOG episodes and other motor symptoms of PD (e.g.,rigidity, bradykinesia), while FOG frequency was inversely correlatedwith tremor severity. This underscores the fact that FOG is possibly aresult of pathophysiology that has yet to be fully explained. FOG hasreceived increasing recognition as a debilitating feature of PD. Severalstudies suggest that FOG affects between 20-60% of PD patients. Becausemobility is so important to quality of life and functional independence,it is not surprising that gait disturbances and freezing in PD oftenlead to wheelchair use and nursing home admissions.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the mechanism underlying aparticular case of FOG is optionally determined. In an exemplaryembodiment of the invention, the levels by which the subjects sufferfrom different subtypes of freezing are determined: in particular, oneor more of ‘start hesitation’, ‘turning hesitation’, ‘narrow passagefreezing’, ‘open runway freezing’ and/or ‘reaching destinationfreezing’. Optionally, based on such determination, therapeutic andpreventative measures for FOG are defined. In an exemplary embodiment ofthe invention, when a patient is diagnosed, the degree of susceptibilityto each type of FOG is separately measured and a vector indicating therelative susceptibility optionally created.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system is provided whichreveals distinct physiological processes that occur during walking priorto the appearance of FOG, and/or on identifying the relative and/orabsolute role of a potential triggers, e.g., shifts of attention, thatcan exacerbate gait and cause FOG. Once these processes are identifiedand/or quantified, therapeutic measures can be designed and optionallytested in follow-up studies.

In one example, for a patient where bilateral coordination is a problem,interventions that focus on bilateral coordination may promoteresiliency to FOG triggers.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, measurements of patientsare used to provide information to add to the body of knowledge on thecognitive capacity in advanced PD during the “Off” state of themedication cycle and its role in gait and FOG. Optionally, thisinformation is used for providing diagnosis and/or treatment for suchconditions.

Several studies have examined the mechanisms that might underlie FOG.Unique but not uniform patterns of EMG were seen in patients with FOGjust prior to freezing. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, itis assumed that rhythmic contractions of leg muscles beyond a certainrate might contribute to FOG. In an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, the timing of EMG activity of the tibialis anterior andgastrocnemius muscles is checked and if found to be abnormal may beconsidered a warning sign of imminent FOG in a subject.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, from a phenomenologicalperspective, one or more of the following features which may be found inFOG patients (especially secondary to PD) are measured and/or monitored,especially in response to various provocations: Impairments in steplength scaling, reduced dynamic control of postural stability, increasedgait asymmetry, poor bilateral coordination of gait and rhythmicity.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a test includes uncoupledpedaling of a patient, which may indicate a relationship betweenbilateral coordination of gait (BCG) and FOG in PD. In such pedaling,using a stationary bicycle with the left pedal mechanically uncoupledfrom the right pedal, although the relative phase (between the legs) waslocked at approximately 180 degrees in healthy elderly and some of thepeople with PD, PD patients who suffer from FOG (PD+FOG) exhibitedrelative phase drift monotonously from 0 to 360 degrees, or anirregularly modulated phase generation. The existence, amount and/orother parameters of such drift may be used as an indicator for FOG andespecially for an imminent FOG episode, for example, in response to aprovocation.

It is hypothesized that uneven control of “coupled oscillators” (meaningthe paddling action of each leg serves as oscillator) may result in suchdisarrayed phase generation. Unlike in the case of uncoupled bicycle orin gait, the coordination of left-right cycling movements poses lesschallenge to the central nervous system (CNS) since the mechanicalcoupling between the pedals facilitates the anti-phased left-rightpattern. The possibility that impaired cerebral control of bilateralcoordination is associated with freezing, e.g., in a particular patient,can gain further support if left-right coordination of alternating handmovements is impaired in a particular subject as compared to patientswho do not suffer from FOG (PD-FOG) and/or suffer other types of FOG.

Another indicator which is optionally used is radius of turn. In sometypes of FOG patients, a turning arc is increased as compared to PD-FOG,possibly reducing the level of asymmetry involved in the task and easingthe burden on coordination. Such a change in angle and/or effect ofangle on cognitive tasks, walking speed and/or other measurable signals,may be used to indicate a FOG burden, in accordance with someembodiments of the invention. In an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, based on this test and others as indicated above, amulti-dimensional score will be generated. In one example, among thedimensions quantified are severity of ‘start hesitation’, ‘turninghesitation’, ‘narrow passage freezing’, ‘open runway freezing’ and‘reaching destination freezing’, additional optional types of dimensionsare the freezing response to provocation related to pathophysiologiesassociated with freezing, e.g., the freezing response to uncoordinated,and/or, asymmetric, and/or disrhythmic and/or scaled down and/orstability challenged gait. In addition, the magnitude of the freezingepisode (both legs or one and duration) is optionally included in thescore.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the system uses asimulating-monitoring integration, optionally coupled using a closedloop. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the stimulating partis mainly composed from virtual reality (VR) technologies (e.g., a headmounted display or goggles or a projection on a considerable part of aroom in which a subject is located or even a screen) that introducefreezing provoking situations, for example as part of an ongoing scene.Optionally or alternatively, non-VR technologies are used, for example,standing displays.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, sensors (e.g., mobilitysensors, accelerometers), for example, mounted on the subject's bodyand/or off of the subject's body (e.g., cameras) will generatemeasurements. Optionally, the measurements are processed to predict anddetect online (e.g., within 0-10 seconds from occurrence and/or with alead time of between 360 and 3 seconds, for example, between 5 and 10seconds lead time) the occurrence of FOG. Optionally or alternatively,processing is used to assess the gait pattern, quantify its qualitiesand/or feed this information to the VR system to adjust the virtualenvironment in which the subject is functioning. For example, adjustmentcan include providing a more provocative situations and/or differentsituations (e.g., using a table of potential FOG triggers and/or atraining and/or a testing program).

Optionally or alternatively, miniaturized physiological sensors (e.g.,ECG, skin conductance, fNIRS, EMG) or non-miniaturized and/or wirelessand/or wired sensors are used to provide information about physicaland/or mental stress.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, following a ‘freezingstress test’, optionally a standard set of situations and/or protocols,the system will be able to quantify properly the freezing burden and itsindividual characteristics for each subject.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, after diagnosing, thesystem (or a different system) will create individually-tailoredtraining programs, for example, for training the motor system of thesubject to adapt motor strategies that distance them from thephysiological circumstances that lead to FOG. For example, if theevaluation highlights that a subject has significant problems withbilateral coordination (BCG being a measure of bilateral coordination ofgait) and gait asymmetry, the focus of the treatment can be on motorlearning that will result in modifying the gait pattern to become morecoordinated. Likewise, if rhythm generation problems are identified,then the treatment may focus on rhythmicity improvements. These conceptsare illustrated in FIG. 1. A potential to improve this and reduced thepropensity to FOG is illustrated in FIG. 3.

FIG. 1, section A shows quality of performance of gait featuresassociated with FOG (thin lines in top 5 traces) may vary over time(hypothetical data). Similarly the level of interaction between thesegait features may vary with time and/or in response to differentcircumstances or provocations. BCG—Bilateral coordination of gait.

FIG. 1 section B illustrates how the combination of the performances ofthe individual gait features may dictate whether FOG will occur orwhether functional walking will be maintained. If the overallperformance deteriorates below a certain threshold (horizontal line),then gait freezes (FOG zone). Deterioration in the overall gaitperformance can be an expression of malfunction of single gait featureassociated with FOG or of multiple features. In some cases, thedeterioration of one gait feature can cause the deterioration of one ormore gait features as portrayed in FIG. 1(A).

As another example, if a subject is prone to freezing due to poor gaitperformance when his/her attention is shifted to deal with simultaneouscognitive demands, then training strategies will be directed to assistin prioritizing between gait and mental tasks and/or to improve thesimultaneous performance. In another example, if a subject is prone tofreezing when dealing with challenges that cause him/her to be mentallystressed, then such situations will be introduced during trainingperiods, for example by virtual reality technique, to improve the copingof the subject in such situations.

Exemplary Diagnosis System

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a sub-unit of a systemcomposed of mobility and physiological sensors and from online feedbackapparatus (e.g., earphones) will serve as a ‘field assistive andmonitoring device’ that will be programmed by a ‘parent controller’ toonline predict and detect the gait pattern, physiological conditions andFOG propensity and/or will provide corrective adjustments via thefeedback apparatus to modify motor patterns. The information gathered bythe ‘field assistive and monitoring device’ will optionally be fed tothe ‘parent controller’ by remote access (e.g., internet, mobile phone)and adjustments to the assistive algorithms and to the feedback regimewill be done based on all data gathered so far. The concept of‘assistive device’ may be complementary, at least in part, to the‘training device’. While the latter addresses desirable sustainablemodifications in the function of the motor system with regards to gait,an assistive device is to address gait difficulties in an ad-hocfashion. Both, however are optionally based on the information gatheredfrom the diagnostic element of the technology and may also be providedtogether in a single system.

FIG. 2A illustrates some potential modules of a system 200 for use on apatient 202, one or more of which modules may be provided (e.g., beingoptional), in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention.

(a) Central module (CM) 204—a main controller of the system (e.g., acomputer, smartphone or other processing device, optionally mobile),located locally or remotely relative to other parts of system and/ordistributed as several spaced apart systems, which optionally hasinterface with additional modules, local and/or remote, withcomputational capabilities.

(b) Treadmill and clinic based virtual reality module (TCVRM) 206—placedin the clinic, but optionally at home or at a public location such as anold-age home or day care center and provides virtual reality protocols.Techniques of virtual reality can vary, for example portable goggleswith virtual visual input or an LCD screen, for example. Optionally oralternatively, sound and vibratory feedback may be provided. Movementmechanism other than treadmills can be used, for example, bicycles orstepping in place.

(c) Physiological and mobility sensors based freezing detection andprediction module (PMFDPM) 208—will optionally be used to assess thelevel of freezing burden achieved in response to the freezing provokingprotocol. Optionally, this module is based on body wearable sensors(e.g., accelerometers, heart rate sensors, sweat sensors and/or brainblood flow sensors) and/or from information gained by the cameras ormovement sensors (e.g., Kinect), which are optionally included in theTCVRM (e.g., which may be used to determine subject motion).

(d) Tele medicine freezing module (TMFM) 210—enables communicationbetween CM and modules that function outside the clinical site, forexample, by internet and/or mobile phone infrastructure, in real time(e.g., within 10 or 3 seconds or less) and/or optionally by reports.

(e) Biofeedback based freezing prevention and alleviation module (BBPAM)212—a sub-system that provides sensory input as a feedback to theevaluation of performance, for training or for assisting (i.e., wearableassistive mechanism) purposes. In an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, this module when acting as an assistive device, will generateexternal cueing whenever the PMFDPM will detect or predict theoccurrence of freezing, so the subject can utilize the sensory input toavoid freezing. For example, if the sensory signal includes rhythmicauditory stimulation the subject will pace, coordinate, and/or enlargehis steps to the rhythm. This module when acting as a trainer, can, forexample, provide the sensory input only during training sessions duringwhich the subject will be exposed to freezing provoking conditions, andthe feedback generated by the module will be used to train the subjectsto the correct response (e.g., pace, coordinate, and/or enlarge thesteps), with the purpose that following the training these responseswill become natural whenever the physiological conditions approach FOGepisode. An example such sub-system is described in FIG. 2B, below.

(f) Home based virtual reality module (HBVRM) 214—optionally providesvirtual reality protocols at home and/or other non-clinic settings. Insome embodiments, a warning device is provided which is worn by apatient and/or located in his home, detects a potential FOG situationand helps the patient avoid and/or overcome such situation. Optionally,such a device includes at least one sensor, a processing unit and astimulus generating unit. Optionally or alternatively, such a device isused for training during daily activities, e.g., to increase a subjectssensitivity to problematic situations and/or to intentionally provokesuch situations (e.g., by encouraging rhythmic movements), when thepatient is forewarned. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, theHBVRM can communicate with CM (e.g., via the TMFM) to receive basic dataregarding the clinical condition of the subject. Based on that, theHBVRM can optionally define the daily at-home training program and/orwill evaluate progress. For example, based on the knowledge from the CMthat a subject suffers from impaired bilateral coordination, the HBVRM(or other module) can produce training tasks that require improvement ofcoordination, by for example, instructions to turn in place, e.g., bydisplaying on the home computer screen and/or on the home TV set, VRsettings that requires coordination. At any point during the training,the HBVRM can provoke semi stress test to identify the response of thesubject to the training.

In FIG. 2A, solid black lines indicate the modules that are interfacingdirectly with the subject 202; grey and/or dashed lines and arrows—eachset of arrows in a specific shading represent a potential scenario forthe use of the invention.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, one or more of thefollowing algorithms/methods are implemented in the system:

-   -   a. Stress test algorithm. In an exemplary embodiment of the        invention, this algorithm will start routine loading (at the        beginning no loading of freezing provocation triggers will be        introduced) of the freezing burden on the tested subject        covering some or all types of freezing: e.g., ‘start        hesitation’, ‘turning hesitation’, ‘narrow passage freezing’,        ‘open runway freezing’ and/or ‘reaching destination freezing’.        In response to this initial testing the freezing burden is        optionally increased and/or decreased as needed in any of the        subtypes mentioned, to identify what is the freezing propensity        in each of the subtypes. Various physiological bracketing and        search methods may be used. One or more of freezing incidences        per freezing provocation, spontaneous freezing episodes, and        durations of all invoked or spontaneous freezing episodes, may        serve as measures for freezing burden, as well as the        quantification of gait qualities associated with freezing, e.g.,        rhythmicity, symmetry, bilateral coordination, step scaling and        dynamic postural control.    -   b. Freezing detection and prediction algorithm. For example,        based on an algorithm known as K-Means, the system can process,        in real-time, the sensor data to characterize the level of        propensity of FOG at any given time. A short training session        may be provided in which an operator will feed in timing of the        actual FOG episodes occurrences, and these data will be used by        the system to define the individual characteristics of the        mobility, and/or physiological (e.g., skin conductance data)        data associated with FOG. Another algorithm based on ratio        between energies in different frequency domains (the ‘freezing        index algorithm’) of the mobility signal may be used instead of        or in parallel to the K-Means algorithm. A weighing algorithm        may be used to determine the relative weight in FOG prediction        and/or detection each of these algorithms. Optionally or        alternatively, pattern matching, Hebian neural networks        computational schemes and/or machine learning can be used by the        PMFDPM to identify patterns and/or match and/or calculate        responses. In another method, wavelet analysis is used to        identify patterns relating to or indicating FOG of one type or        more or in general.    -   c. Cadence calculating algorithm. Optionally, to provide a        cueing signal at the appropriate rhythm, in real time, a cadence        determining algorithm is optionally used (e.g., based on a        spectral analysis of the movements). Based on the mobility        signal the number of steps per unit time will be calculated and        the thus the cadence. This algorithm is optionally implemented        in the BBPAM.    -   d. Training difficulty and training specifications algorithm. In        an exemplary embodiment of the invention, this is a self        iterative algorithm that starts with a specific anti freezing        training program, e.g., expose the subject in laboratory and/or        at home to gait tasks that may invoke freezing and providing        automated training instructions (e.g., vocal and/or external        stimulation). Interweaved within the training sessions, there        are optionally one or more test sessions that will sample gait        and freezing performance, compare the results to the defined        quantifiable goals of the training (e.g., also a priori loaded        to the system), assess progress with respect to time from start        of training, and/or make decisions as for how to continue the        intervention, e.g., the intensity of training and/or the        exposure to different subtypes of freezing. Standard training        planning methods may be used.

Exemplary Usage

There are currently gaps in the ability to diagnose the FOG symptom.Quantification is not standardized and involves cumbersome settings thatare suitable for research but not for routine clinical use. Currenttreatments have limited impact. In an exemplary embodiment of theinvention, the proposed system and/or method, in some embodimentsthereof, may solve the problems of objective and/or quantifiableassessment of the FOG symptom. The second problem associated with theFOG symptom is that treatments are not effective due, in part, to thevariable nature of the appearance of the symptom. In some embodiments,this problem is addressed by the system being adjustable based on thecurrent physiological measures, and thus allows flexible training and/orassistive components. The unpredictable nature of the occurrence of theFOG episodes poses a problem related to the ability to avoid an episodeall-together, and/or to prepare for potential consequence of an episode(e.g., fall). In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, there isprovided predictability of FOG episodes and/or pre-episode warning sothat the approaching episode can be avoided.

Some exemplary usage prophetic scenarios are now described.

Scenario 1: Freezing of gait stress test (designated by dashed greyarrows in FIG. 2A)—central module (CM) will command a Treadmill andclinic based Virtual reality Module (TCVRM) in order to accompanylocomotion while being immersed in ‘reality’ that is likely to provokefreezing of gait episodes (recall FIG. 1, that situations withchallenging coordination, e.g., turning, and challenging stability,rhythmicty and/or reducing step length, may be likely to shift thesubject into the freezing zone). Provocation of reduced step length canbe achieved by, for example, by lowering the belt velocity in thetreadmill, and/or providing visual cues, e.g., projecting lines on thefloor, indicating the size of the required step length and/or by usingvirtual obstacles that require a large or small step over. The subjectwill achieve locomotion by walking on a treadmill or walking within aroom. The subject will be immersed into the dictated VR by means ofscreens or special VR goggles. A physiological and mobility sensorsbased freezing detection and prediction module (PMFDPM) is optionallyused to assess the level of freezing burden achieved in response to thefreezing provoking protocol. This module may be based, for example, onbody wearable sensors (e.g., accelerometers or brain sensors) and/or usefrom information gained by the TCVRM cameras. Optionally, the PMFDPMwill determine the level of FOG burden achieved by the protocol.Optionally, the output of the PMFDPM will be fed into the CM which inturn will modify the protocol according to preset criteria. At thefinish of several iterations one or more of the following may beachieved: 1) A clinical FOG score, for example, the number of freezingepisodes occurring per provocation of freezing, number of spontaneousfreezing episodes, and the duration of the freezing episodes; 2) Anindividual FOG profile, i.e., which situations are related to what levelof propensity for freezing. For example, a profile may includecalculations of the gait features associated with FOG, e.g., aredeteriorating prior to each occurrence, e.g., rhythmicity, symmetry,bilateral coordination, step scaling and/or dynamic postural control.Scenario 2: Prognostic daily monitoring of the freezing of gait symptom(designated by dashed black arrows in FIG. 2A). Scenario 2a—passiveclinical data collection: The CM will embed the information about theFOG profile of an individual to the computational unit within thePMFDPM. The subject will perform his/her daily living carrying thePMFDPM (e.g., see FIG. 2B). The computational unit, based on theindividual FOG profile will assess the level of FOG burden, and inaddition will assess the performance of the gait features associatedwith FOG. This will provide a comprehensive picture about the clinicalFOG conditions throughout the day, including, optionally, in response tointerfering factors such as medication consumption or interventions.This information is optionally fed back to the CM via a tele medicinefreezing module (TMFM) which can utilize, for example, internet ormobile phone infrastructure to pass clinical evaluations to the CM forthe record and use of the health professionals treating the subject.Optionally, data can be also transferred by connecting directly thePMFDPM with the CM (rectangle shaped dashed black arrows for bothoptions). Scenario 2b—active data collection: in addition to what isdetailed in the passive clinical data collection, the CM and TMFM can beused to instruct the subject to perform short dictated locomotionprotocol while the PMFDPM is analyzing the responses and transferringthe information to the CM (via the TMFM). Optional tuning of on linedetection and prediction parameters of FOG is optionally done from theCM to the PMFDPM (lower most rectangle shaped dashed black line).Scenario 3: Intervention type I: Biofeedback based daily livingassistive therapy to prevent freezing of gait (designated by thin blackarrows in FIG. 2A). CM, for example, directly to the PMFDPM, orindirectly via the TMFM, provides parameters for computational algorithmworking in real time for detecting and predicting the occurrence offreezing episode. This loading is done in a preparatory stage anddesignated in dashed lines in the figure the sensors are used to predicta FOG episode and the information from the sensors are sent to thecontrol unit. Once such an episode is predicted or detected the PMFDPMprovides a signal to biofeedback based freezing prevention andalleviation module (BBPAM), which in turn provides sensory feedback(e.g., auditory) to the subject, who utilizes this cueing to avoid orshorten the freezing episode. In this sense this is a closed loop modulethat can provide a biofeedback alarm to the patient even before a FOGoccurs to alert him to change their pattern of movement and utilizemovement strategies to avoid the occurrence. The system could alsoprovide a feedback (e.g., a different sound) when a FOG has alreadyoccurred. This signal may be used as a cue to allow for the patient torecover from the FOG and continue walking.

A variety of types of feedback may be used, for example, based on theresponsiveness of the subject. For example, rhythmic auditorystimulation helps the subject to pace, coordinate and scale his/herstepping and thus avoid stopping and/or shortening. Similarly, tactilestimulation may be used. Another possibility is vocal warning (similarto those used in Global Positioning Systems) and/or tactile vibrationsin the foot, and/or pattern projection on the floor, for facilitatinggait.

As mentioned above, a freezing detection and/or prediction algorithm canuse several approaches, for example an algorithm known as K-Means, willprocess, in real-time, the incoming sensors data to characterize thelevel of propensity of FOG at any given time. Optionally, a shorttraining session is used in which an operator will feed in timing of theactual FOG episodes occurrences, and these data will be used by thesystem to define the individual characteristics of the mobility, and/orphysiological (e.g., skin conductance data) data associated with FOG.Another algorithm based on ratio between energies in different frequencydomains (the ‘freezing index algorithm’) of the mobility signal may beused in parallel to the K-Means algorithm. A third algorithm may weighwhat is the relative weight in FOG prediction and/or detection of eachof these algorithms. Optionally or alternatively, one or more of patternmatching, Hebian neural networks computational schemes and machinelearning may be implemented in the PMFDPM.

Scenario 4: Intervention type II: Biofeedback-based motor learning toameliorate freezing of gait (designated by the thin black arrows in FIG.2A. CM, directly to the PMFDPM, or indirectly via the TMFM, providesparameters for computational algorithm working in real time fordetecting and/or predicting the occurrence of freezing episode. Thisloading is optionally done in a preparatory stage and designated withthin black dashed lines in the figure. This information is optionallyutilized to run physiotherapy intervention program.

For this intervention, the gait pattern is optionally monitoredcontinuously by the PMFDPM and the risk of an approaching FOG episodemay be assessed in real-time based on the loaded algorithm. For example,patients may be challenged to walk at home or in the physiotherapyclinic, in situations that typically cause FOG (e.g., turns, tightcircles, e.g., personalized for that patient). In the clinics the TCVRMwill also be used for this purpose. At home conditions, a home basedvirtual reality module (HBVRM) is optionally used also for this purpose.Both the TCVRM and HBVRM are optionally programmed by the CM, which willoptionally base its programming on feedback from the PMFDPM. When thegait patterns starts to deteriorate towards FOG, external cueing isoptionally invoked by the BBPAM to restore a more normal gait pattern.This concept is illustrated in FIG. 3, and may be used in otherembodiments described herein, as well. Desirably, after intensive suchintervention the central nervous system will learn to automaticallyavert FOG (even without external cueing), and will maintain thiscapability by long term retention.

FIG. 3 section A illustrates improving gait performance in general, forexample, by maintaining a sustained effective therapeutic effect onmultiple gait features associated with FOG (recall FIG. 1), which is atarget for therapy that will likely reduce the FOG burden. In general,one way of reducing the likelihood of FOG is to move the overall gaitperformance further away from the ‘failure’ threshold (horizontal lineseparating the ‘functional zone’ from the ‘FOG zone’). FIG. 3 section Billustrates online intervention which may reduce the duration of FOGepisodes using an assistive device format (scenario 3 type I) or anintensive training format (scenario 4 type II). The black arrows reflecttwo instances where FOG might normally occur when during daily living ina subject prone to freezing. A biofeedback device is optionally used toprovide external sensorial cue to prevent the ‘sinking’ into the FOGzone, namely gait performance so deteriorated so that functional gait isno longer possible. As mentioned above, a variety of types of feedbackmay be used based on the responsiveness of the subject. For example,rhythmic auditory stimulation helps the subject to pace, coordinate andscale his/her stepping and thus avoiding and/or shortening. Optionallyor alternatively, rhythmic/periodic tactile stimulation may be used forsuch a result. Another possibility is vocal warning (e.g., similar tothose used in Global Positioning Systems) and/or tactile vibrations inthe foot, and/or pattern projection on the floor, all of which may beeffective in facilitating gait under various conditions. For example,methods as described in any of the following are optionally used:

-   Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, Deutekom M, Nieuwboer A, Willems A    et al. “Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients    with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review”. Clin. Rehabil. 2005;    19(7):695-713.-   J M Hausdorff, J Lowenthal, T Herman, L Gruendlinger, C Peretz, N    Giladi. “Rhythmic auditory stimulation modulates gait variability in    Parkinson's disease”. Eur J Neurosci. 2007: 26:2369-2375.-   S. Frenkel-Toledo, N. Giladi, C. Peretz T. Herman, L.    Gruendlinger, J. M. Hausdorff. “Treadmill walking as a pacemaker to    improve gait rhythm and stability in Parkinson's disease”. Mov    Disord 2005; 20:1109-1114.-   T. Rubenstein, N. Giladi, J. M. Hausdorff. “The power of cueing    circumvent dopamine deficits: A brief review of physical therapy    treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease”. Mov Disord,    Vol. 17, pp. 1148-1160, 2002.-   “Targeting dopa-sensitive and dopa-resistant gait dysfunction in    Parkinson's disease: selective responses to internal and external    cues”. Rochester L, Baker K, Nieuwboer A, Burn D. Mov Disord. 2011    Feb. 15; 26(3):430-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.23450. Epub 2010 Dec. 13.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, when various treatmentsand/or cues are available, different ones may be tested on a patient andwhichever treatment and/or cue performs best, is selected for treatingthe patient.

FIG. 2B is a schematic block diagram of a patient device 220, forexample, suitable for implantation or wearing while ambulatory.Optionally, at least part of the functionality of device 220, forexample processing, communication and/or acceleration measurement, isprovided by a cellular telephone and/or by a sensor unit in wirelesscommunication (e.g., Bluetooth) with the cellular telephone.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, device 220 includes one ormore sensors, for example, as described herein, whose output isprocessed by a processor 224. A FOG (or other gait abnormality)detector, for example, embodied as one or more software modules executedby the processor, may detect, for example, expected or on-going FOG,sub-clinical FOG and/or pre-FOG states. In response, processor 224 mayinstruct controller 228 to cause one or more stimulators 230 (e.g.,sound or vibration output devices) to stimulate the patient to overcomeand/or prevent and/or otherwise ameliorate the FOG. After sensing that afreezing event is approaching, the sensor could alter the gait rhythm,suggest that the person speed up or slow, or even suggest that he/shesit down. This could be achieved via, for example, an electrical,auditory (sound and/or speech) and/or vibratory stimulus. In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, device is a light weight wearablesensor that will be worn by the subject at all times. The location ofbody attachment may depending on a patient's preferred stimulus; forexample if the patient prefers an auditory stimulus then the device maybe worn on a belt (e.g., include a clip) with an attached ear piece, ifthe patient prefers tactile stimulus, he can wear the device on the shinof his leg or in a necklace or bracelet. Optionally, the device is intwo or more parts, communicating wirelessly and/or by wire, for example,one part being a sensor and optionally a processor and another partbeing a stimulator and optionally a processor.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, an implant provides asignal to an external component to cue the subject. Optionally, theimplant also applies a treatment, for example, electrical stimulation(e.g., DBS). Detection and/or prediction of a gait abnormality isoptionally provided by the implant, optionally using internal and/orusing external sensors.

Anticipatory Postural Adjustment

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it is expected that asubject makes anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), for example,changes in center of gravity (COG) and center of pressure (COP).Optionally, such APAs are detected, for example, using cameras and/ormovement sensors and used, for example instead of or in addition toother physiological measures, to predict and/or identify gaitabnormalities such as FOG.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, an APA is measured byquantifying the COP and/or by measures of trunk movements usingaccelerometers and/or gyroscopes carried on the belt or other positionsthat allow for estimation of the COP and/or COG. By challenging thesubject in the VR system, it may be possible to detect early, mildand/or subclinical APA disturbances which may also optionally be used asmarkers for FOG. As noted herein, early detection allows to implement anearly and potentially protective interventional approach to delay,reduce and/or prevent FOG and/or other functional disorders.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APA detection is used fordriving a cueing system for treatment of FOG and/or other gaitdisorders.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APA detection is used as amarker for the usefulness of interventional programs with drugs, deepbrain stimulation or physical rehabilitation methods.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APAs are used to predictFOG, for example, before turns, when starting to walk and/or even during“open runway”, usual walking.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APAs are used as a targetof training, for example, after training, larger APAs may be expectedfor some patients.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APAs are used to diagnose apatient, for example, by seeing if and how APAs change and/or aredelayed as a function of the type or other parameter of challenge used.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, VR simulations are modifiedin real-time to cause a desired APA (e.g., a certain COP). Optionally,the simulation is modified (e.g., various scenarios tried, intensitychanged) until a desired APA is detected and/or failure is decided.

The abstract of Exp Neurol. 2009 February; 215(2):334-41. Knee tremblingduring freezing of gait represents multiple anticipatory posturaladjustments. Jacobs J V, Nutt J G, Carlson-Kuhta P, Stephens M, Horak FB reads as follows: Freezing of gait (FoG) is an episodic, briefinability to step that delays gait initiation or interrupts ongoinggait. FoG is often associated with an alternating shaking of the knees,clinically referred to as knee trembling or trembling in place. Thepathophysiology of FoG and of the concomitant trembling knees isunknown; impaired postural adjustment in preparation for stepping is onehypothesis. We examined anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) priorto protective steps induced by a forward loss of balance in 10Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with marked FoG and in 10 controlsubjects. The amplitude and timing of the APAs were determined fromchanges in the vertical ground-reaction forces recorded by a force plateunder each foot and were confirmed by electromyographic recordings ofbilateral medial gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior and tensor fascialatae muscles. Protective steps were accomplished with a single APAfollowed by a step for control subjects, whereas PD subjects frequentlyexhibited multiple, alternating APAs coexistent with the knee tremblingcommonly observed during FoG as well as delayed, inadequate or nostepping. These multiple APAs were not delayed in onset and were ofsimilar or larger amplitude than the single APAs exhibited by thecontrol subjects. These observations suggest that multiple APAs producethe knee trembling commonly associated with FoG and that FoG associatedwith a forward loss of balance is caused by an inability to couple anormal APA to the stepping motor pattern.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APAs are measured using aforce platform and/or using center-of-pressure dynamics (e.g., forcesensitive insoles or the accelerometers described above, which canreflect movement of the body's center-of-mass, which will reflect alsothe APA).

The inventors have also discovered that, based on a study 29 patientswith Parkinson's disease (PD), freezing of gait episodes during turnsare marked by multiple failed postural adjustments. These posturaladjustments are typically seen as Anticipatory Postural Adjustment atgait initiation (e.g., before the person starts to walk). However, usingmeasures of Center of Pressure (COP) Dynamics, they can also bequantified during turning and/or during straight line walking.

The obstacles placed in front of the subject generally also require aform of an APA (e.g., shifting of the center of gravity from one foot tothe other to allow for sufficient clearance of the virtual obstacle). Bychallenging the subjects with these virtual obstacles (e.g., ofdifferent lengths and/or heights), the APAs/COP in response (e.g.,before and/or during) can be measured. Possibly, in a healthy subject,the APA size will be related to the size/height of the obstacle.Optionally or alternatively, if/how these APAs change during FOG ismeasured. This can give another measure of FOG pre-disposition andpossibly further enhance the ability to grade FOG severity, to predict,and/or to measure the response therapy.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, APAs are treated as areother measures, such as BCG. For example, APA is included as one of theweighted features in the scoring for FOG.

It is noted that in some embodiments, the APAs are measured on theground (e.g., if patient is walking on ground towards a very largescreen and/or wearing goggles) and in other embodiments APAs aremeasured on motion devices, such as treadmills and/or bicycles.

In an example of on ground VR display, a patient follows a standard labcourse, such s walking along a corridor, and goggles are used to injectobstacles into the course and/or provide other loads as describedherein.

Exemplary Methods

FIG. 2C is a schematic flowchart 240 of a method of applying the methodsdescribed herein, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.

At 242 a patient is challenged, for example based on the methods asdescribed herein and/or based on a previous diagnosis.

At 244, one or more clinical and/or sub-clinical indications ofmanifestations of FOG are detected, or, alternatively, not detected.

At 246, the indications are evaluated, for example, by comparing to atable of standardized results.

At 248 the challenges are optionally modified, for example, to ensure asufficient amount and/or quality of data is collected and/or to collectdata about different types and/or sub-types of gait disorders.Challenging 242 is optionally repeated.

At 250, a treatment plan and/or a risk is optionally determined, basedon the above evaluation(s).

FIG. 2D is a schematic flowchart 260 of a method of treatment,optionally carried out by one or more of the devices described herein ormanually, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention.

At 262, one or more FOG indicators are detected, for example, usingaccelerometers or other motion detectors or using a fNIRS sensor orother sensor to detect indications correlated with changes in blood flowto the brain.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, EEG or other means are usedinstead of or in addition to fNIRS to assess changes in cerebralactivity. A potential advantage of using both EEG and fNIRS is that EEGhas better temporal resolution and fNIRS has better spatial resolution.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, EEG can be used to measurebrain electrical activity at rest and/or to measure (e.g., afterfiltering) brain activity during actions such as walking in the wholebrain or in specific regions. Optionally, EEG is used to detect minimalchanges in brain activity secondary to focal activation and/ordepression of neuronal discharge. Based on the observations of decreasedblood flow to the frontal lobe during FOG, it is expected that therewill be focal frontal slowing or as called in EEG terms, theta or deltaactivity over the frontal lobe. Abnormal EEG activity can also becharacterized by hyper or hypo synchronization of brain electricalactivity in a specific area. EEG activity has been shown to be able todetect not just the movement potential but also the preparatorypotential that comes before the actual movement is executed, which maysupport the use of EEG for prediction and detection of an actual event.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, continuous scalp EEGmonitoring during walking, for example, by the Oxford ambulatory EEGmonitoring system, is used to differentiate between normal stepping andFOG or pre-FOG state by change in background EEG activity over thefrontal lobe bilaterally. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention,in the 1-3 seconds prior to the FOG itself and/or during the actualfreezing episode, slowing of the background activity will be detected byautomated frequency analysis system which is already present in theOxford system. The system will be able to learn (e.g., using machinelearning methods as known in the art) the normal locomotion of thesubject treated and recognize the FOG as a significant change from theregular background. Similar detection may be applied for falls and/orother gait abnormalities.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, EEG measurement is used tospecifically detect increase or decrease of activity in frontal lobesand/or motor regions, for example, based on changes in intensity (e.g.,at certain frequency bands).

A potential advantage of EEG is its integration into an ambulatoryand/or implanted device.

At 264 a treatment is applied, for example, cueing, as described above,or TMS stimulation, in response to the detection. In an exemplaryembodiment of the invention, the application is within 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5,10 or intermediate or greater number of seconds. Optionally, thetreatment is timed to the predicted onset of the gait disorder, ratherthan to its prediction and/or detection time.

At 266 the effect of treatment is measured, for example, over a periodof 1, 10, 100, 100 or intermediate or greater number of seconds. Inresponse, the treatment and/or treatment parameters are changed.Optionally, the system learns which treatment is more effective forwhich set of measured indication values. For example, if asymmetry orpoor rhythmicity or narrow passageways are frequent causes of the FOG inthis patient, the training program may be adjusted to teach the patientto deal with this provocations.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, TMS (Trans Cranial MagneticStimulation) and/or other interventional means, such as biofeedback, isused to modify cerebral activity and/or blood flow in the brain. In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, when a decrease in blood flow toa frontal region is detected, TMS is applied (e.g., to the frontal lobe)to increase this flow. This may allow executive function to assist inovercoming FOG, reduce the likelihood that FOG or other gaitabnormalities will occur.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, when an increase in bloodflow to a motor region is discovered (e.g., by an fNIRS sensor), TMS maybe applied to the frontal regions, for example, to further increaseblood flow, for example, in patients in need thereof.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the VR system will be usedto synchronize the detecting and stimulating systems, fine tuning thefrequency and strength of the TMS signal and/or for teaching andpracticing the whole detecting-stimulating system with the patientbefore sending him home. Optionally or alternatively, the system is usedto determine if such treatment can be assistive (e.g., by synchronizingTMS application with challenges, possibly with a delay there between).

Optionally or alternatively, TMS is applied based on predicted detectionof FOG or other gait abnormality, additionally or alternatively todetection of cerebral changes, optionally in anticipation thereof.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, after treatment by TMSand/or training, it may be expected to find changes in blood flowpatterns during pre-FOG and/or FOG states (or other gait abnormalities),even if there is no or small improvement in the abnormality. Optionally,this is used as a target for training. Desirably, the frequency ofevents will be reduced and/or difficulty in provoking such increased. Inother embodiments, TMS is integrated into a worn device, such as a capand the patient can be “treated” when needed.

Exemplary Implementation and Experiments

In this section, various practical implementations as a system aredescribed, including results from utilizing these implementations fordiagnosing and/or treating people in accordance with some embodiments ofthe invention. It should be noted that the teachings herein are notlimited to the specific system tested and may be used with otherembodiments of the invention.

Exemplary System Architecture

In this exemplary embodiment, the system is designed to integrate bothonline locomotion stimulating techniques and monitoring technologies.The system automatically identifies the walking patterns of theindividual, introduces freezing provoking situations (a kind of‘freezing stress test’) in a controlled environment, quantifies andcharacterizes the freezing episode, and assesses the best repertoire oftreatment suitable for the individual.

FIG. 4A is a picture of such a system. This ‘all in one’ system iscomprised of a treadmill 401, a virtual reality (VR) simulation 402(here shown on a display, rather than, as an alternative, goggles), andaccelerometers 410. The patients walk on treadmill 401 while immersed inthe VR environment 402. Small passive markers are optionally attached tothe patient's shoes or other parts of the patient's body or clothing,optionally using a harness, and act as the interface or gateway to theVR system (e.g., via a camera 408 or other position and/or orientationtracking system). In an alternative embodiment a marker-less trackingsystem is used. Using two optitrack cameras 410, the movements of thefeet are detected and inserted into the VR simulation using an avatar(e.g., as shoes on the screen) that accurately reflect the movement ofthe feet in reaction to the VR scene. Optionally, the patient wears asafety harness. Optionally or alternatively, the patient wears a heartrate monitor 406. Optionally, the subject wears fNIRS sensors 404 (e.g.covered by a head cap) and/or ECG sensors. These cerebral sensors areoptionally used for physiologic monitoring and/or validation purposes. Acontroller 412 is optionally used to control and/or read sensors 410and/or provide input to VR environment 402.

Optionally, accelerometer and/or gyroscope body-worn sensors as shown inFIG. 4B are attached to, for example, the ankles of the patient to helpdetect FOG episodes. Exemplary Shimmer sensors 420 are provided bywww(dot)shimmer-research(dot)com. The sensors contain 3-axisaccelerometers and 3-axis MEMs Gyro that record data at a sampling rateof 100 Hz via Class 2 Bluetooth Radio, and optionally serve to close theVR simulation loop. Optionally, sensors 420 include an external dock426, a reset button 424 and/or indicators, such as LED indicators 422.In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, data from the Shimmersensors is channeled to Matlab software, running on a laptop computer(e.g., 412), that performs real-time synchronization between the 2shimmers (on both ankles) and runs an algorithm for detecting FOGs,based on, for example, the FOG Index (FI), described below. Optionally,the laptop running the FI algorithm is connected to a computer runningthe virtual reality simulation using a network cable and TCP protocol.When a FOG is detected, a signal is sent to the virtual realitysimulation, enabling the simulation to record the precise location andtime of the detected event within the simulation. The system alsorecords the leg on which the event was detected first (the sensor thatdetected the FOG threshold), the speed at which the patient was walking,the type of trail i.e., the conditions of the VR simulation, the type ofobstacles used, if any, and/or the type of FOG provocations provided bythe simulation at the time of the event.

FIG. 4C shows an aerial visual representation of a VR simulation trailand a recorded FOG event within the trail. The time of event within thesession is recorded as well as the location on the path (represented bythe white x, in this case on the narrow bridge over the virtual river),the type of trail used and the challenges provided (in this case, nightcondition and narrow pathways) and the first leg the event was detectedby the shimmer sensors (in this case the right leg).

While this implementation may use a dedicated VR simulation, in otherembodiments, the VR simulation is part of a commercial game. Optionally,the game is modified to generate a desired rate of challenges, forexample, by creating narrowings in pathways. Alternatively, a game isselected with sufficient challenges and the patient simply plays thegame, while the system tracks which challenges affected the patient andin what manner.

As noted above, for validation and/or other uses, additional sensors maybe used, for example, miniaturized physiological sensors (NeXusMindMedia BV the Netherlands) may be attached to the patient's chest tomonitor the patient's heart rate during different scenarios and walkingconditions and physical and mental stress. Wireless Functional NearInfrared Spectroscropy sensors (fNIRS—PortaLite, Artinis, TheNetherlands) may be placed on the patients forehead to assess bloodoxygenation in the frontal lobe during the test. These signals mayreflect frontal lobe activation in response to different stimulationsand/or allow the assessment of cognitive function during FOG.Optionally, these two modalities are used for validation of the FOGevents. Optionally or alternatively, they can be used as an option inthe diagnostic system to provide additional information to theclinician. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, all systems andsub-systems are synchronized and the sessions are videotaped to allowfor further analyses of the FOG events.

The VR Simulation

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the VR simulation isdesigned specifically for this use and written in OGRE (Object-OrientedGraphics Rendering Engine) which is a scene-oriented, real-time,flexible 3D rendering engine, programmed in C# using Direct3D and OpenGLas the graphic libraries. The simulation optionally requires processingof multiple stimuli simultaneously. The VR scene consisted of an outdoorboardwalk on which different obstacles were placed. The patients wererequired to walk on the treadmill while negotiating the obstacleswithout hitting them. These mobility skills required decisions aboutstep amplitude in two planes (vertical obstacles that required a highstep and horizontal obstacles which required long steps) coordinatedwith walking behavior. See, for example, FIG. 4D which shows twoexamples of virtual scenes designed to provoke FOG. The patient'smovement is represented by the shoes on the screen. These providefeedback as to movement, success or failure in negotiating the obstaclesand a sense of presence within the VR simulation. A more complete avatarmay be used as well. Obstacles presented were either vertical (toprepresented as a hurdle) requiring high clearance, or horizontal (bottomrepresented by a black muddy spot) requiring a long step. In order tosuccessfully negotiate the obstacles, patients need to plan the correctresponse, plan the timing of passage and anticipate the speed requiredfor performance. If successful they receive points on the score boardshown on the top of the screen. If an error occurs and the patienttouches the obstacle, a red light appears and the attempt is scored ascollision. The amount of obstacles changes depending on the difficultylevel of the trial and the speed at which they were walking at. Thedecision as to the side of appearance (right or left leg) is optionallychosen based on the more impaired side of PD symptoms (e.g., with 75% ofthe obstacles presented to the more affected side).

These decisions are optionally made more difficult using distracterssuch as changes in lighting and moving objects in the simulation and/orby adjustment of the frequency and/or size of the virtual obstacles.This allows varying the cognitive load independently of the gaitcomplexity and/or potential FOG triggers. Optionally, the scene includesfreeze provoking features such as bridges over rivers, narrow passages,tunnels, a cave, distracters and/or lighting effects. FIG. 5 shows twoexamples of virtual freeze provoking scenarios. These provocationsincluded features such as bridges over rivers (see also FIG. 4D),tunnels or a cave (top), narrow passages (bottom) distracters andlighting effects (e.g., walking in diminished lighting conditions or ina bright sunny day). In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, suchfeatures are manipulated with respect to, for example, one or more oftheir frequency of appearance, size and/or location according to theindividual patient's need and/or the difficulty level desired for atrial.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the environment imposes acognitive load requiring attention, planning and response selection aswell as processing of rich visual stimuli involving several perceptualprocesses that have been associated with FOG. The VR provides visualand/or auditory feedback upon success or error of crossing the obstaclesand/or if a FOG occurs; this feedback is optionally used as part of thetherapeutic option. The system optionally provides information as to thelocation of the FOG, the timing of it, the leg on which it was firstdetected, and/or the duration of the event.

Data Processing and Extraction

As noted the system as described herein is optionally used for 1)assessing the possibility of detecting FOG using the system, 2)validating the FOG detection algorithms against physiological measures,and/or 3) quantifying the severity of FOG by combining differentparameters of performance. Below is a description of exemplary methodsused for data processing usable for these aims.

Gait Data

Gait data is optionally extracted from the accelerometers in the shimmersensors. Average gait speed and stride time are optionally evaluated forwalking trials. Data collected by the accelerometer are also optionallyused to assess measures of rhythmicity and/or stability known to beimpaired in patients with FOG. These included, for example, one or moreof measures of variability, consistency and symmetry.

-   -   Spectral analysis of the calibrated acceleration signal in the        locomotion band (0.5-3.0 Hz) is optionally used to assess        measures of variability of the signals during gait on the        treadmill without obstacles. The peak amplitude the width and        the slope of the dominant frequency in the anterior-posterior        direction are extracted from the raw signal; a sharper and        narrower peak may reflect a more consistent, rhythmic, and        healthier gait pattern, e.g., reduced gait variability and/or        lower stride-to-stride fluctuations.    -   A symmetry ratio is optionally calculated based on the        difference between acceleration of the right and left sensors        during the no obstacle condition.    -   A Phase Coordination Index (PCI) is optionally calculated from        the acceleration signal by determining the stride duration of        one foot in the gait cycle (defined as) 360°, where the relative        timing of the contra-lateral heel-strikes defined the phase        which is represented by φ (ideally, φ=180 for every step). The        sum of the coefficient of variation and the mean absolute        difference between φ and 180° is defined as the PCI,        representing variability and inaccuracy, respectively.        FOG Index

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a FOG Index (FI) iscalculated from spectral considerations. In an exemplary embodiment ofthe invention, the FI reflects a ratio between the power in gaitfrequencies (e.g., 0.5-3.0 Hz) and the FOG frequencies (3-8 Hz). In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, calculation of these two measuresis performed continuously and/or for each leg separately. In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, a real-time running window isapplied to the data from the vertical axis (perpendicular axis to theground). The size of the chosen window is optionally 1.2 seconds, as anexample of a tradeoff between better frequency analysis and minimallatency, but smaller windows sizes (e.g., 0.6 seconds or less) may beused. The information from each window is transformed using, a spectraltransform, such as Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the distribution ofthe signal, in the frequency domain, is calculated.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a low FI is taken toreflect strong gait while a high FI suggests the present of a FOG.Optionally, the decision that a FOG occurred is done by comparing theFI, from each leg, to a pre-defined threshold. More formally, thecalculation of the FI assesses each window, where N is the number ofsamples in each window and X_(k) is the FFT of the data in the signal xwithin that window:X _(k)=Σ_(i=1) ^(N) x(i)e ^(−2πi/N)The spectrums in the Gait and FOG frequencies are optionally calculatedfrom the FFT as follows:

Spectrum(k) = X_(k) * conj(X_(k)/N)${Spectrum}_{Gait} = {\sum\limits_{k \in {{Gait}\mspace{14mu}{frequencies}}}{{Spectrum}(k)}}$${Spectrum}_{FoG} = {\sum\limits_{k \in {{FoG}\mspace{11mu}{frequencies}}}{{Spectrum}(k)}}$FI may then be calculated from the spectrum in gait and FOG:

${FI} = \frac{{Spectrum}_{Gait}}{{Spectrum}_{FoG}}$

Optionally or alternatively, a calculation method may be used, asdescribed in, for example, Moore S T, Macdougall H G, Ondo W G.“Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease”. J.Neurosci. Methods 2008; 167(2):340-8; and/or J. M. Hausdorff, J. Balash,N. Giladi “Time series analysis of leg movements during freezing of gaitin Parkinson's disease: akinesia, rhyme or reason?” Physica A: StatMechanics & Appl 2003; 321: 565-570.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, when a FOG is detected, asignal is sent to the virtual reality simulation. One or more of theprecise location and time of the occurred event within the simulation,the leg on which the event was detected first, the speed at which thepatient was walking in, the type of trail, obstacles and provocationprovided by the simulation at the time of event are optionally recordedby the VR simulation. Data on FOG detection are optionally extractedfrom both the sensors and the VR simulation for further analysis.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a FOG severity score isused, which is a composite measure based on the number of FOG eventsdetected during the test, gait parameters reflecting abnormal patterns(e.g., stride time variability (CV), PCI, symmetry), the response to theVR provocations, number of errors on obstacle crossing, the cost ofenvironmental features (determined as the stride time in trial 3-stridetime in trial 4) and/or the cost of cognitive load on performance(stride time in trial 5-stride time in trial 4). Table 1 (FIG. 14) showsthat a patient receives an overall, composite score, based on thecombination of multiple components. In addition to this single summarymeasure, a clinician can receive more detailed information thatdescribes FOG propensity based on performance in the VR system. In anexemplary embodiment of the invention, using a weighted analysis basedupon all of the relevant components, a score is provided on a 4 pointLikert scale. Optionally, the weighting is updated, for example, perpatient clinical background and/or as more patients are diagnosed andtreated.

Exemplary Detection and/or Prediction Using k-Means

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a machine learning method(e.g., k-means or other supervised or unsupervised or semi-supervisedlearning method) is used to identify and/or predict FOG events, of asingle type and/or of several types.

In one example, using FOG annotations of data, extracted from a video bya physiologist, each window is given a label as “During FOG”, “Pre FOG”and “Other”. Optionally, a period of time prior to a beginning of FOG,labeled as “Pre FOG”, is of 2 second, though other lengths may be used.“Other” labels are used, for example, while the patient was sitting,getting up from the chair, or otherwise not engaged in normal gait. Inan exemplary embodiment of the invention, as a training set for theK-means algorithm only the signals labeled as “Other” and as “Pre FOG”are used and the remaining samples are considered as a test group. Inone example, a learning set contained 15 FOGs out of 32 which wererecorded during a training practice. Other, for example, greater,numbers may be used. K-means is used to automatically divide theinputted data into 80 clusters. Then, using the label, assigned to eachsignal section, the probability for each cluster to be predictive for aFOG is calculated. In one example, a subject was asked to walk indifferent conditions in the lab for 30 minutes and a total of 32freezing episodes were identified in a post hoc video analysis. The datawere halved and the first walking period that included 15 freezingepisodes used for learning. The results indicate that some clusters tendto appear before FOG events and can give a prediction from 20% and up toalmost 60%. It is also noted that the spectrum of the predictiveclusters are somewhat similar to each other and different formnon-predictive clusters. More specifically, time series of acclamationdata were parsed to 1 s windows and FFT was run. All windows were sortedto 80 clusters based on frequency domain characteristics resemblance. Ina post hoc analysis each cluster was assigned with its probability ofbeing predictive for the occurrence of FOG episode within the “next 2seconds”. Most of the clusters have less of 10% predictive power, andthat about 5-10 clusters have increasing predictive power. One clusterwas found with a predictive power of almost 60%.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a determination is made asto which of the clusters that were defined by the K-means algorithmshould be chosen as predictors for FOG episodes. By applying aprobability threshold and using only clusters with a probability higherthan this threshold it is possible to calculate the sensitivity andspecificity of such prediction. FIGS. 15A-15D describe this process.Technological sensitivity and specificity values (e.g., examining if theclusters will define every 0.5 s of the trace as predicting or notpredicting FOG within the following 2 seconds), were calculated (panels15A and 15C). In addition a prediction of a FOG is defined if at leastone prediction was done at the pre FOG time (2 s). If a FOG waspredicted then “Hit”=1 for it and otherwise “Hit=0”. Specificity wascalculated in a similar manner (panels 15B and 15D). It can be seen thatfor the training period (panels A and B) the chosen probabilitythreshold for optimizing the benefits of high sensitivity (highpercentage of “hits”) and high specificity (low percentage of “falsealarms”) is between 10% and 20% probability (the intersection betweenthe traces). Hits rate was 93.3% (14/15 FOGs, predicted correctly) andSpecificity was around 92% (FIG. 15B). Using the same clusters that weredefined for the learning data, and choosing the same probabilitythreshold, on the testing data yields prediction of 100% (17/17 fogs arepredicted) and Specificity of 88.7% (panels 15C and 15D). In all thepanels, sensitivity (of the FOG prediction algorithm (ordinates)) is thedecreasing line and specificity is the increasing line. These areplotted against the probability threshold (abscissas).

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, this process is used toadapt the detection and/or prediction for specific subjects. In someembodiments, for each subject the system has to “learn” the specificalgorithm characteristics that will be used. The results may then beprogrammed into, for example, the shimmer sensors. Optionally, bydetecting pre-FOG events, a patient can be treated in time even if theFOG event determination time is longer than a few milliseconds, forexample, being between 0.5 or 1 second and 2-3 seconds.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a similar method is used tolabel FOG events, rather than pre-FOG events.

Experiment

The above-described implementation was used in an experimental study, asdescribed below and show the ability of the proposed VR system, inaccordance with some embodiments of the invention (e.g., FIGS. 4A-FIG.5) to provoke and detect FOG episodes under safe environmentalconditions. The system is able to provoke FOG episodes on the treadmill,which until recently was considered rare. The system is able tosensitively detect these FOG episodes, and using the system features isable to quantify and/or configure a severity score that can be used todiagnose and later provide care to patients experiencing FOG. It isnoted that features described with the experiment may be used or notwith other embodiments of the invention form the one used in theexperiment.

Participants

The developed system was tested on 4 patients with PD (mean age63.75±7.36 yrs) who suffer from FOG. Patients were included if they werediagnosed with PD (based on the UK brain bank criteria), reportedexperiencing FOG episodes (more than 5 on the new FOG questionnaire) andwere able to walk unsupported for at least 10 minutes. Patients wereexcluded if they had substantial cognitive deficits (scored <21 on theMontreal Cognitive Assessment scale), unstable heart disease or sufferedfrom severe depression. FOG can occur in other patient populations,e.g., patients with a higher-level gait disorder may also be diagnosedand/or treated using methods and/or systems as described herein.

Procedures

After signing an informed consent, demographic information and medicalhistory were collected by a researcher. All testing for validation ofdiagnostic properties occurred in the “wearing off” state (approximately3 hours after intake of medications). Prior to testing the system, abaseline assessment was conducted to evaluate gait over ground. Gaitspeed was measured over 10 meters. This information was imperative asthe treadmill speed during the system's evaluation was set for eachpatient based on their over ground walking speed. In other embodiments,speed may be set during trial and/or matched to an actual walking speedon a continuous and/or semi-continuous basis. Patients were then fittedwith the sensors (Shimmer, Nexus and fNIRS) for testing with the system.The test included 5 walking conditions each of 4 minutes for a total of20 minutes of walking. This is comparable in time to a typical cardiacstress test. It could be shortened or lengthened, depending on theresponse of the patient to initial stress conditions. For example, astress tests can include between 1 and 10 conditions, each applied forbetween 0.5 and 10 minutes. A total length, including breaks, can be,for example, between 5 and 60 minutes, for example, between 15 and 45minutes. Rest breaks of 5 minutes were given between the trials, duringwhich the patients were seated. The trials varied with each walkingcondition focusing on a different component that may influence FOGevents:

Trial 1—Difficult: high level of difficulty, maximum amount ofobstacles, maximum amount of freeze provoking challenges (tunnels, cave,bridges, and narrow passages)

Trial 2—Moderate: medium level of difficulty, moderate amount ofobstacles, minimal amount of freeze provoking challenges, lowenvironmental complexity

Trial 3—Environment: high level of difficulty, moderate amount ofobstacles, minimal freeze provoking challenges, high environmentalcomplexity (obstructed visibility, night)

Trial 4—FOG challenges: low level of difficulty, no obstacles, maximumfreeze provoking challenges (tunnels, caves, bridges and narrowpassages)

Trial 5—Cognitive: high level of difficulty, moderate amount ofobstacles, low amount of freeze provoking challenges, additionalcognitive task (on top of walking with the VR simulation, the patientswere asked to perform a verbal fluency task).

While other trials/levels may be selected, these represent the mostcommon causes for FOG.

Validation of FOG Detection

In order to validate FOG detection, multiple methods were used.

-   -   a. During the tests, an experienced clinician observed the        patients and annotated any FOG episodes that occurred. The        report included both descriptive measures of severity and time        of event. In addition, all trials were videotaped. Another        experienced researcher was asked to review the recorded videos        and annotate time of FOG events based on the video recordings.        These were then compared to the FOG events detected by the        system and by the researcher who attended the tests.    -   b. Miniaturized physiological sensors (NeXus MindMedia BV the        Netherlands) were attached to the patient's chest to monitor the        patient's heart rate (HR) during different scenarios and walking        conditions and physical and mental stress to try and identify if        any changes occurred that could indicate an event. As noted,        optionally, these sensors can also be used to aid the clinician        in the diagnosis and evaluation of the possible causes of FOG in        a particular patient; for example, heart rate increases occur        just prior to and/or during an episode; such an observation        supports the idea that any detected event is indeed a FOG        episode. The wireless NeXus sensors transmitted data in        real-time to a computer using Bluetooth technology. Using        designated software, heart rate and inter-bit-intervals were        extracted from the data collected by the sensors in all gait        trials.    -   c. Wireless functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (PortaLite,        Artinis, The Netherlands) was used to assess changes in frontal        lobe blood flow during gait and specifically during FOG events.        The system uses Near Infrared Spectroscopy to measure local        tissue saturation as well as oxy, deoxy and total hemoglobin        concentrations in the frontal lobe during activity. Oxy and        deoxy hemoglobin data (in units of micromol/liter) during all        gait trials were extracted using Matlab software. As noted,        optionally, these sensors can also be used to aid the clinician        in the diagnosis and evaluation of the possible causes of FOG in        a particular patient. It may, for example, indicate inadequate        shifting of cognitive resources that lead to a FOG episode.        Cognitive training, via the system or otherwise, may help to        alleviate this problem.

Data from both HR and FNIRS were examined throughout the gait trials andchanges and events were assessed and verified according to the videorecordings. The signals were then examined for an interval of 10 secondsbefore and after a FOG event (as detected by the system) to observe anychanges in activation. The signals were then compared to no-event andno-obstacle trials.

Data Analysis

Data was examined for normalcy and descriptive statistics were extractedfor all gait measures. FOG detection data were compared across andwithin all subjects. Validation data were analyzed based on time seriesacross all FOG events. Quantification data were analyzed for eachpatient as a case study.

Results

Diagnostic Capabilities

Four patients with PD participate in this study designed to demonstratediagnostic capabilities. Disease severity of all 4 patients was 3 on theHohen and Yahr scale with an average disease duration of 10.2±6.7 years.All patients reported experiencing FOG in the home and communityenvironment and filled out the New FOG questionnaire (NFOG-Q). TheNFOG-Q defines severe FOG condition as patients who score >15 on thequestionnaire. Three of the patients participating in this study scoredmore than 15 on the NFOG-Q and were considered to have severe FOG. Allpatients were functionally active and living in the community. Table 2(FIG. 15E) provides the patient's descriptive characteristics.

Gait Data

Mean gait speed during over-ground walking was 1.17±0.1 m/s. Gait speedson the treadmill were set 20% slower to allow for obstacle negotiationas well as try to induce FOG events. Treadmill speeds ranged between1-1.2 m/s and were not changed between the different trials, to maintainconsistency of gait and evaluate strategies of walking in the differentconditions. FIG. 6 demonstrates the acceleration signal of the walk ofpatient 2 in trial 1 (with obstacles). The top graph represents thesignal collected in the anterior-posterior axis (AP), the middle signalrepresents the movement in the vertical axis (V) and the bottom signalrepresent movement in the medio-lateral direction (ML). The ellipsesindicate the location of obstacles within this time frame. It may benoted that the acceleration increases when patient attempted to crossthe obstacle. The Y axis is arbitrary (voltage units) and the X-axis isin samples (i.e., time).

Average stride time in the no-obstacle condition was 1.52±0.88 sec.During the obstacle conditions, stride time was shorter (1.15±0.66 secand 1.35±0.74 sec). Shorter stride time was also apparent during thecognitive condition (1.42±0.68 sec) reflecting shorter steps in the morecomplex conditions.

The costs of adding obstacles, environmental features or a cognitivetask were calculated as the difference in stride time from that observedin the no-obstacle conditions. Not surprisingly, patients demonstratedthe highest difference in stride time in the obstacle condition (0.37sec), as compared to no-obstacle condition. The cost of addingenvironmental or cognitive challenges were still considerable but not asrobust (0.17 sec and 0.09 sec).

A symmetry ratio was calculated as the difference in stride time betweenthe sensors worn on the right and left legs during the no obstaclecondition and reflected as percent. This ratio reflects a difficulty incontrolling gait evenly on both legs. Patients 1 and 2 showed almostperfect symmetry (99% and 98% respectively). Patient 4 had a lowsymmetry value of 64%, whereas patient 3 demonstrated the highestbetween leg inconsistency with a ratio of only 33%. This possiblyreflects dis-coordination which could result in the increased risk ofFOG.

Measures of consistency in walking were also evaluated. Coefficient ofvariation (CV) and PCI were calculated from the gait during theno-obstacle condition. For both measures, the closer the values were tozero, the more consistent the gait rhythm, suggesting a less impairedgait pattern with more intact bilateral coordination. In addition, theamplitude and width of the dominant frequency throughout the 4 minuteno-obstacle walk were examined using spectral analysis. In table 3 (FIG.16), are shown the results of the 4 subjects compared to a male controlsubject (67 years of age). A sharper and narrower peak reflects a moreconsistent, rhythmic, and healthier gait pattern, i.e., reduced gaitvariability and lower stride-to-stride fluctuations.

FIG. 7 shows the raw acceleration signal and spectral density of thefrequency band of gait of a patient (patient 4) over 10 seconds during ano-obstacle trial. The width and the amplitude of the power spectraldensity (e.g., as measured by units of power per radians per second) aremeasures that reflect consistency; higher and narrower signalscorrespond to more consistent and less variable gait and vise versa. Inthe example in FIG. 7 the patient is walking on a treadmill that, on itsown provides an external cue for consistency, and yet the signalproduced by the accelerometer reflects high variability of gait, whichcould account to a higher risk for FOG's. Optionally, such variabilityin face of the external signal is used as a risk indicator even if noFOG (or other gait disorder) are detected. The effects of the variouschallenging conditions on these measures can also be included as anothermeasure of FOG propensity. For example, similar to what was shown inFIG. 3, if the patient has difficulty negotiation obstacles and altershis/her gait pattern to bring it closer to the FOG zone, it willincrease the patient's score and the likelihood that they have FOG, ingeneral.

FOG Detection

A total of 77 FOG events were detected by the shimmer sensors; 45 ofthose were also identified by the therapist observing the gait as a FOGepisode or abnormal stepping, shuffling or incorrect corrective attempt.These events reflected changes in frequency of the signal during walkingwithin the window stipulated by the FFT. All events lasted less than 2seconds except 7 which were longer (between 3-6 seconds). These longerevents were all experienced by patient 4. Because of the use of thetreadmill, the FOG events were relatively short as the treadmill beltcontinued to move and this contributed to the ability of the patients toeventually take a step forward and recover. Nonetheless, on thetreadmill, good success was had at provoking FOG. Because of themovement of the treadmill, 3 of the longer events resulted in a completecessation of walking and the researcher had to stop the treadmill as thepatient was not able to take one step forward. This can be implementedas an automated feature activated in real-time, by a differentembodiment of the invention.

FIG. 8 shows a comparison between the acceleration signal of a regulargait and the signal during a FOG episode. The acceleration signal on theleft demonstrates relative consistency in strides as well as power ofstepping. On the right is the gait of the same patient during a FOGevent. The rapid jerkiness of the movement, the irregularity of thesignal and the increased power are apparent. The FOG event lasted 5seconds, after which the treadmill was stopped to prevent the patientfrom falling. Algorithms mentioned above (e.g., machine learning,K-means, wavelets and others) can be applied to automate this task, forexample, by automatically detected FOG and then slowing or stopping thetreadmill. Optionally, if it is determined that the treadmill wasstopped at a non-FOG event, then the treadmill stoppage and itsconsequences are treated as a challenge and patient response thereto isoptionally evaluated.

Validation

FOG detection by the sensors was compared against the recordings done bythe researcher in the test and the identification of FOG events usingvideo recordings. There were 77 events detected by the system, 45 ofthese were corroborated by the researcher observing the tests. From thevideos, only 35 events were detected. Although this agreement is nothigh, it is important to note that since the events were very short,some of them were not observed by the researchers or easily observed onthe video. In addition, there were no FOG events detected (or rated inthe video) that were not detected by the system, hence the system showshigh sensitivity but possibly moderate specificity. The system deemedsome of the corrective patterns of walking (before obstacles) as FOGbecause they required a higher (faster pattern of walking). Thisindicates that perhaps the threshold window of detection should beincreased and/or other detection parameters changed, optionally beforeand/or after obstacles and/or otherwise as a function of temporal and/orspatial relationship to an obstacle and/or other trigger. Optionally oralternatively, such corrective patterns are learned by the system and/orprovided as preset patterns.

To further validate the system, physiological measures (fNIRS and HR) weused as well. FIG. 9 demonstrates the raw signal from the fNIRS during aFOG event. It is clear that there is a large change in the blood flow inthe frontal lobe during the FOG event. This change was observed in allthe long duration FOG events (more than 3 seconds). The light linerepresents de-oxy hemoglobin and the dark line represents oxyhemoglobin. The time series reflects 5 seconds prior to the event and 5seconds after the event. The decrease in oxy hemoglobin in the frontallobe during the event may suggest that the brain is circumventing bloodflow to motor areas to compensate and in order to terminate the FOGepisode.

This pattern was completely different when no FOG occurred. FIG. 10shows an example of the fNIRS raw signal during the obstacle conditionwhen no FOG occurred. The light line represents de-oxy hemoglobin andthe dark lie represents oxy hemoglobin. The time series is 15 secondslong. As compared to the blood flow in FIG. 9, during the obstaclenegotiation task the oxy hemoglobin did not increase during the trial,and demonstrated a stable consistent signal.

A relationship between changes in acceleration signal and changes inphysiological measures is also investigated. FIG. 11 combines all 3measures and provides for the first time an indication that changes ingait during FOG can be reflected in physiological measures even when theevent is short in duration and the gait is performed on a treadmill. Thetop signal is the acceleration. The first vertical dashed line reflectsthe time the system detected the FOG. The middle signal reflects theheart rate extracted from the NeXus and the bottom signal shows theoxy-hemoglobin signal from the fNIRS. Note the changes in all 3 signalsduring and/or after the FOG event. The treadmill was stopped (secondvertical line) after 4.2 seconds to allow the patient to recover fromthis event. After the cessation of walking, the signals start torecover.

Quantification

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a FOG severity score is acomposite measure based on the number of FOG events detected during thetest, gait parameters reflecting abnormal patterns (e.g., CV, PCI,symmetry) associated with FOG, the response to the VR provocations,number of errors on obstacle crossing, the cost of environmentalfeatures (e.g., determined as the average stride time in trial 3−averagestride time in trial 4) and the cost of cognitive load on performance(e.g., average stride time in trial 5−average stride time in trial 4)(see table 2, FIG. 15). Using a weighted analysis, a score was providedon a 4 point Likert scale. The FOG score as determined using the systemfor each patient, is as follows.

Patient 1—

ED is a 64 year old male with PD with disease duration of 5 years. EDreported suffering from FOG episodes that occur almost exclusivelyduring turns. A total of 28 FOG episodes were detected by the systemduring walking on the treadmill in all of trials, however, only 14events were validated by the researchers as either FOG episodes orshuffling and abnormal gait patterns. It is believed that some of thisdiscrepancy may be due to the high sensitivity of the system compared tothe clinicians view. The system as describe herein, in accordance withsome embodiments of the invention is able to detect even patterns of‘pre-FOG’, short minimal episodes that do not turn into full FOGepisodes. The freezing episodes mainly occurred during the difficulttrial and while environmental challenges were added. ED walks with avery low clearance gait and often his gait appears as shuffling. 67% ofthe errors made on obstacle crossing were secondary to low clearancewhich increases the risk for FOG and falls. Table 4 (FIG. 17) summarizesthe results of his tests.

Patient 2—

SC is a 73 year old man who was diagnosed with PD 15 years ago. Hecomplains of occasional freezing mostly during turns and when going intotight occluded places. A total of 20 FOG episodes were detected by thesystem with 6 verified by video and an expert. 5 of the 6 events werecaused by provocation within the VR scene of narrow passages and atunnel. SC has relatively low gait variability but high bilateraldis-coordination (i.e., high PCI values). Table 5 (FIG. 18) shows thetest parameters that contributed to the patients FOG severity score.

For this and other patients, the score, combined with the detailedexplanation about the circumstances that provoke FOG are optionally usedto understand and/or treat the problem, e.g., tailoring the prognosisand therapy. For example, evaluation of the aerial maps will showprecisely what environmental properties triggered freezing in thispatient, in combination, with which other provocations and VR features.Since this data can be reviewed simultaneously with the movement sensordata and gait properties, this may enable more precise identification ofthe particular circumstances (e.g., internal and/or external) thattrigger freezing.

Patient 3—

MB is a 55 year old male who was diagnosed with PD 17 years ago. MBreports freezing on occasion that appear mostly when he is tired orduring turns. Eleven FOG events were detected by the system, 7 of themwere also detected by the researchers. Five of these 7 events occurredafter provocations were added. MB's gait is fairly irregular with highasymmetry between the more affected (right) and less affected sides andhigh CV and PCI. This may also make FOG detection more difficult and/orless reliable, due to increase in background noise. Additional featuressuch as environmental changes and a secondary cognitive task furtherdeteriorate his gait and increase the risk for FOG's and consequentlyfalls.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, in such patients withvariable gait, training includes two components. A first component toreduce gait variability (e.g., desirably reducing risk for FOG ingeneral) and a second component on dealing with specific FOG events.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the methods and/or systemsdescribed herein are configured to be sensitive enough to detect FOG orfuture FOG risk even if no FOG symptoms are seen.

In some embodiments of the invention, the FOG detection mechanism isadapted to the patient. For example, a short monitoring period may becarried out during which the algorithm learns the patient's normal(e.g., variable or not) gait as well as freezing episodes. Then, forexample, in a semi-automatic fashion, a user can tag suspected FOGevents and these can be used to subsequently teach the algorithm.

Patient 4—

DT is a 63 year old male who has been diagnosed only 4 years ago. DTreports suffering from FOG especially during the evening when he istired. He does not see a specific pattern to the events of FOG. Duringthe test the system detected 17 events and the researchers detected 16.The FOG events for the most part were long considering he was walking ona treadmill. FOG events were observed as mostly the result of planningand negotiating the obstacles and during the cognitive condition. DTdemonstrated more difficulty in negotiating the hurdles (vertical)obstacles then the puddles (horizontal). The frequency of the FOG eventswas high (2 in 30 seconds on the cognitive trial). DT's gait is highlyvariable and asymmetrical which further increases the risk for FOG. Thelonger FOG episodes gave the opportunity not only to detect the FOG butalso to observe what would enable to recover from the FOG.

Results on Therapeutic Application

Further experimentation tested the idea of treatment based on diagnosisand/or controlled level of challenges. Without being limited to aspecific hypothesis, it is possible that that motor learning principlesand/or bio-feedback can modify the locomotion strategies employed bysubjects with PD who are otherwise prone to FOG so that they will now beable to avert/reduce/recover from and/or otherwise assist approachingand/or ongoing FOG episodes. Possibly, the central nervous system (CNS)will be trained to modify the gait pattern in situations that typicallycause FOG and/or generally increase risk of FOG (e.g., variabilityand/or lack of symmetry).

The paradigm used to assess this hypothesis applies rhythmic auditorystimulation (RAS) in an open-loop, feed-forward manner whenever asubject makes a turn, one of the most common FOG-provoking tasks. It ishypothesized: i) that external cueing can alter the gait pattern in sucha way that the patho-physiological processes that typically lead to FOGwill be averted. ii) Following repeated training with RAS, patients willlearn to turn in a manner that does not provoke FOG, even in the absenceof external cueing. Similarly, RAS can be administered just prior toother FOG provoking conditions. For example, if there is a change inrhythmicity and/or BCG when the patient approaches narrow passageways,RAS can be administered just before this to teach the patient how tomore appropriately cross through these FOG provoking environments.

Given these hypotheses, the effects on FOG (frequency and duration)after a 6 week long intervention in which cueing was applied in afeed-forward, open-loop manner to enhance CNS pacing during turns andimplicitly teach the patient's motor control system to minimize thepropensity to FOG, were evaluated. In this pilot study, 11 patients withPD were assessed.

FIG. 12 depicts changes in group average of the number of FOG episodes(produced during figure 8 shaped trials (carried out on the ground, nota treadmill) which was the primary outcome measure) in response to theintervention. Within subject, the number of laps in the ‘post’ testingwas identical to the number of laps that had been performed in the ‘pre’testing. Chart A shows the number of FOG episodes during the figure 8shaped paths. Mean values (±SE) for number of FOG episodes pre lap,which were 0.5±0.2 and 0.2±0.2 episodes/lap for the pre and post testingrespectively. Chart B shows the mean (±SE) duration of FOG episodes,which were 10.1±7.5 s and 1.3±0.8 s for the pre and post testingrespectively.

A somewhat stronger effect is shown during corridor walking whichprimarily consists of straight line walking (with a 180° turn at theedge of the corridor). FIG. 13 depicts this effect. Chart A shows thenumber of FOG episodes. Mean values (±SE) for number of FOG episodes pre10 m were 0.78±0.40 and 0.05±0.02 for the pre and post testing,respectively. Chart B shows The mean (±SE) duration of FOG episodeswhich were 5.2±1.7 s and 1.2±0.7 s for the pre and post testing,respectively.

These results also indicate that training on a treadmill can transfer toa non-treadmill situation.

General

It is expected that during the life of a patent maturing from thisapplication many relevant display technologies will be developed and thescope of the term virtual reality is intended to include all such newtechnologies a priori.

As used herein the term “about” refers to ±10%.

The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes”, “including”, “having”and their conjugates mean “including but not limited to”.

The term “consisting of” means “including and limited to”.

The term “consisting essentially of” means that the composition, methodor structure may include additional ingredients, steps and/or parts, butonly if the additional ingredients, steps and/or parts do not materiallyalter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition,method or structure.

As used herein, the singular form “a”, “an” and “the” include pluralreferences unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example,the term “a compound” or “at least one compound” may include a pluralityof compounds, including mixtures thereof.

Throughout this application, various embodiments of this invention maybe presented in a range format. It should be understood that thedescription in range format is merely for convenience and brevity andshould not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of theinvention. Accordingly, the description of a range should be consideredto have specifically disclosed all the possible subranges as well asindividual numerical values within that range. For example, descriptionof a range such as from 1 to 6 should be considered to have specificallydisclosed subranges such as from 1 to 3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc., as well as individual numberswithin that range, for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This appliesregardless of the breadth of the range.

Whenever a numerical range is indicated herein, it is meant to includeany cited numeral (fractional or integral) within the indicated range.The phrases “ranging/ranges between” a first indicate number and asecond indicate number and “ranging/ranges from” a first indicate number“to” a second indicate number are used herein interchangeably and aremeant to include the first and second indicated numbers and all thefractional and integral numerals therebetween.

As used herein the term “method” refers to manners, means, techniquesand procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limitedto, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, orreadily developed from known manners, means, techniques and proceduresby practitioners of the chemical, pharmacological, biological,biochemical and medical arts.

As used herein, the term “treating” includes abrogating, substantiallyinhibiting, slowing or reversing the progression of a condition,substantially ameliorating clinical or aesthetical symptoms of acondition or substantially preventing the appearance of clinical oraesthetical symptoms of a condition.

It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, forclarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also beprovided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, variousfeatures of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in thecontext of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or inany suitable subcombination or as suitable in any other describedembodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the contextof various embodiments are not to be considered essential features ofthose embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without thoseelements.

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specificembodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modificationsand variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art.Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives,modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scopeof the appended claims.

All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in thisspecification are herein incorporated in their entirety by referenceinto the specification, to the same extent as if each individualpublication, patent or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. Inaddition, citation or identification of any reference in thisapplication shall not be construed as an admission that such referenceis available as prior art to the present invention. To the extent thatsection headings are used, they should not be construed as necessarilylimiting.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method to train a subject diagnosed withfreezing of gait (FOG), comprising: assessing FOG in a subject bypresenting freezing provoking stimuli to said subject on a display of atraining system, and wherein said display is fixed relative to a surfaceon which said subject walks; identifying one or more freezing provokingstimuli from said presented stimuli, that increase a likelihood of FOGin said subject; generating a training program by a controller of saidtraining system comprising one or more tasks stored in a memory of saidtraining system based on results of said assessing, wherein each of saidtasks comprises one or both of cognitive or motor tasks; and trainingsaid subject to change said subject response to said freezing provokingstimuli using said one or more tasks.
 2. The method according to claim1, comprising measuring a status of said subject following said trainingand adjusting at least one parameter of said one or more tasks of saidtraining program based on said status.
 3. The method according to claim1, wherein said assessing comprises assessing said FOG by performing aFOG stress test by said subject and wherein said identifying comprisesevaluating a response of said subject to said FOG stress test.
 4. Themethod according to claim 3, wherein said FOG stress test comprisespresentation of scenarios designed to stress a cognitive ability and/ora perceptual ability of said subject related to FOG events in saidsubject.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said assessingcomprises identifying FOG subtypes.
 6. The method according to claim 5,wherein said FOG subtypes comprise start hesitation and/or turninghesitation.
 7. The method according to claim 5, wherein said FOGsubtypes comprise narrow passage freezing and/or open runway freezing.8. The method according to claim 5, wherein said FOG subtypes comprisereaching destination freezing.
 9. The method according to claim 1,wherein said training comprises presenting virtual scenarios to saidsubject using a VR system or on said display.
 10. The method accordingto claim 9, wherein said training comprises presenting virtual obstaclesto said subject using said VR system or on said display.
 11. The methodaccording to claim 10, wherein said display is a fixed display locatedat a distance from said subject position, and wherein said virtualscenarios and/or said virtual obstacles are presented on said fixeddisplay.
 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein said virtualscenarios and/or said virtual obstacles are presented to a virtualrepresentation of said subject on said fixed display.
 13. The methodaccording to claim 11, wherein said one or more tasks of said trainingprogram comprise dual tasking.
 14. The method according to claim 1,wherein said one or more tasks of said training program comprise walkingwhile dual tasking.
 15. The method according to claim 2, wherein saidone or more tasks of said training program comprise reaction to one ormore virtual obstacles presented to said subject.
 16. The methodaccording to claim 15, wherein said adjusting comprises adjusting thenumber of said one or more virtual obstacles presented to said subjectand/or the appearance frequency of said obstacles.
 17. The methodaccording to claim 2, wherein said training program comprises presentinga virtual walking path to said subject.
 18. The method according toclaim 17, wherein said adjusting comprises adjusting a width of saidvirtual walking path based on said status of said subject following saidtraining.
 19. The method according to claim 18, wherein said virtualwalking path comprises one or more turns, and wherein adjustingcomprises adjusting the number of said one or more turns in said virtualwalking path based on said status of said subject following saidtraining.
 20. The method according to claim 17, wherein said virtualwalking path comprises one or more bifurcations, and wherein saidadjusting comprises changing the number of said one or more bifurcationsin said walking path based on said status of said subject following saidtraining.
 21. The method according to claim 15, wherein said adjustingcomprises adjusting the size of said one or more virtual obstacles. 22.The method according to claim 1, wherein said assessing FOG in a subjectis performed at least partially manually by an expert.
 23. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein said assessing FOG in a subject isperformed at least partially automatically by an assessing system.